starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 13:53:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Support filtering of VLANs by parent site group #5786

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:32:40 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:32:40 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jhammond-git on GitHub (Dec 16, 2021).

NetBox version

v3.1.0

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

I would like to see a search filter under IPAM > VLANs that shows only VLANs that belong to a Site Group through their VLAN Group - i.e., VLAN 10 belongs to VLAN Group "Chicago", which belongs to Site Group "Illinois". Filtering for Site Group Illinois should include VLAN 10, which it doesn't currently do.

The current site group filter "filters on the site to which a VLAN is assigned..." (per Jeremy Stretch).

Use case

VLAN groups and site groups let us logically and physically group our network. If I move my VLANs to a site group scope, they are no longer assigned a Site and I can't get a comprehensive list of VLANs that are in a site group if there's more than one VLAN group within that site group.

Database changes

None that I can think of

External dependencies

None.

Originally created by @jhammond-git on GitHub (Dec 16, 2021). ### NetBox version v3.1.0 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality I would like to see a search filter under IPAM > VLANs that shows only VLANs that belong to a Site Group through their VLAN Group - i.e., VLAN 10 belongs to VLAN Group "Chicago", which belongs to Site Group "Illinois". Filtering for Site Group Illinois should include VLAN 10, which it doesn't currently do. The current site group filter "filters on the site to which a VLAN is assigned..." (per Jeremy Stretch). ### Use case VLAN groups and site groups let us logically and physically group our network. If I move my VLANs to a site group scope, they are no longer assigned a Site and I can't get a comprehensive list of VLANs that are in a site group if there's more than one VLAN group within that site group. ### Database changes None that I can think of ### External dependencies None.
adam added the type: featurepending closurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 19:32:40 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:32:41 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:32:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2021):

What are the proposed new filters?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2021): What are the proposed new filters?
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:32:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jhammond-git commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2021):

VLAN Groups' Site Group, where scope is DCIM > site group. Since there's a filter for Site Group, I'm not sure how this would be termed in the filter list.

@jhammond-git commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2021): VLAN Groups' Site Group, where scope is DCIM > site group. Since there's a filter for Site Group, I'm not sure how this would be termed in the filter list.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:32:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2022): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:32:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2022):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 22, 2022): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: revisions needed type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5786
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?