starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Filter interfaces/ports on virtualchassis_id #5459

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:28:18 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:28:18 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @steffenschumacher on GitHub (Oct 1, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @rhyser9 on GitHub.

NetBox version

V2.11.3

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

For the interfaces API endpoint, it would be nice if one could filter on virtualchassis_id, beyond device_id. I imagine it would be fairly simply include, but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id.

Use case

Efficiency in loading virtualchassis interfaces via one api request vs per-device requests

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @steffenschumacher on GitHub (Oct 1, 2021). Originally assigned to: @rhyser9 on GitHub. ### NetBox version V2.11.3 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality For the interfaces API endpoint, it would be nice if one could filter on virtualchassis_id, beyond device_id. I imagine it would be fairly simply include, but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id. ### Use case Efficiency in loading virtualchassis interfaces via one api request vs per-device requests ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 19:28:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:28:18 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:28:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rhyser9 commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021):

"...but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id"
I don't see that this needs to be the case. In the same way that you could specify a region and then a site within that region, you could specify a virtual chassis and then the device within that chassis. This also could assist with narrowing down the options in the device form field

@jeremystretch I can implement this.

@rhyser9 commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021): _"...but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id"_ I don't see that this needs to be the case. In the same way that you could specify a region and then a site within that region, you could specify a virtual chassis and then the device within that chassis. This also could assist with narrowing down the options in the device form field @jeremystretch I can implement this.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:28:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@steffenschumacher commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021):

"...but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id"
I don't see that this needs to be the case.

True - if it’s not custom to put in guard rails like this, that’s fine - guess users of the API are grownups😉

@steffenschumacher commented on GitHub (Nov 11, 2021): > _"...but it would need to be mutually exclusive with filtering on device_id"_ I don't see that this needs to be the case. True - if it’s not custom to put in guard rails like this, that’s fine - guess users of the API are grownups😉
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5459
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?