starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Filter on multiple values for custom fields #5310

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @milonline-eu on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021).

NetBox version

v3.0.1 - Demo instance

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

Create a Custom field, Type: Multiple selection, Assigned models: DCIM > device, Choices: 1,2
Create a device with custom field set to 1
Create a device with custom field set to 2
Go to filter of devices, choose 1 and 2 for the custom field.

Tested on demo v3.0.1:
https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/?q=&asset_tag=&mac_address=&has_primary_ip=&virtual_chassis_member=&console_ports=&console_server_ports=&power_ports=&power_outlets=&interfaces=&pass_through_ports=&local_context_data=&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=1&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=2

There are two devices with custom field "Test multiselect filter":
https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/88/ "Test multiselect filter" set to 1
https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/89/ "Test multiselect filter" set to 2

Filtering "Test multiselect filter" for "1" and "2" shows only device id 89 (cf_Test+multiselect+filter=1&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=2). I would expect both devices 88 and 89 to be shown.

Expected Behavior

both devices to be shown

Observed Behavior

second device shown only

Originally created by @milonline-eu on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021). ### NetBox version v3.0.1 - Demo instance ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce Create a Custom field, Type: Multiple selection, Assigned models: DCIM > device, Choices: 1,2 Create a device with custom field set to 1 Create a device with custom field set to 2 Go to filter of devices, choose 1 and 2 for the custom field. Tested on demo v3.0.1: https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/?q=&asset_tag=&mac_address=&has_primary_ip=&virtual_chassis_member=&console_ports=&console_server_ports=&power_ports=&power_outlets=&interfaces=&pass_through_ports=&local_context_data=&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=1&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=2 There are two devices with custom field "Test multiselect filter": https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/88/ "Test multiselect filter" set to 1 https://demo.netbox.dev/dcim/devices/89/ "Test multiselect filter" set to 2 Filtering "Test multiselect filter" for "1" and "2" shows only device id 89 (cf_Test+multiselect+filter=1&cf_Test+multiselect+filter=2). I would expect both devices 88 and 89 to be shown. ### Expected Behavior both devices to be shown ### Observed Behavior second device shown only
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021):

This is consistent with 2.11.x, therefore not a bug.

I suspect, but I haven't looked into it, custom fields are only set to filter a single ID and as such only take the last ID.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021): This is consistent with 2.11.x, therefore not a bug. I suspect, but I haven't looked into it, custom fields are only set to filter a single ID and as such only take the last ID.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021):

Per the bug report template:

Additionally, do not rely on the demo instance for reproducing suspected bugs, as its data is prone to modification or deletion at any time.

You need to provide detailed steps that someone else can follow to reproduce the suspected bug. You haven't even specified the NetBox version.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021): Per the bug report template: > Additionally, do not rely on the demo instance for reproducing suspected bugs, as its data is prone to modification or deletion at any time. You need to provide detailed steps that someone else can follow to reproduce the suspected bug. You haven't even specified the NetBox version.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@milonline-eu commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021):

v3.0.1 specified and detailed steps to reproduce it in the description now

@milonline-eu commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021): v3.0.1 specified and detailed steps to reproduce it in the description now
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 5, 2021):

This is consistent with 2.11.x, therefore not a bug.

This needs to be resubmitted as a feature request.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 5, 2021): > This is consistent with 2.11.x, therefore not a bug. This needs to be resubmitted as a feature request.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:32 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@milonline-eu commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2021):

Just tested on 3.1-beta1 and it works fine. And it was solved by #7544

@milonline-eu commented on GitHub (Nov 10, 2021): Just tested on 3.1-beta1 and it works fine. And it was solved by #7544
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5310
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?