starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

some static files not found when BASE_PATH is changed #5157

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:24:53 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:24:53 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @nolta on GitHub (Aug 7, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.0-beta1

Python version

3.8

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Set BASE_PATH = 'netbox/'
  2. Run upgrade.sh.
  3. Load site in browser.

Expected Behavior

All static asset files should be found.

Observed Behavior

Some static files cannot be found (i.e., 404 errors).

For example, the site tries to load /static/netbox.js.map instead of /netbox/static/netbox.js.map. The problem appears to be this line: 6845fb0f00/netbox/project-static/dist/netbox.js (L67)

Perhaps due to this?
6845fb0f00/netbox/project-static/bundle.js (L11)

Changing sourceMappingURL=/static/netbox.js.map to sourceMappingURL=netbox.js.map appears to work, at least for this particular file.

Originally created by @nolta on GitHub (Aug 7, 2021). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.0-beta1 ### Python version 3.8 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Set `BASE_PATH = 'netbox/'` 2. Run `upgrade.sh`. 3. Load site in browser. ### Expected Behavior All static asset files should be found. ### Observed Behavior Some static files cannot be found (i.e., 404 errors). For example, the site tries to load `/static/netbox.js.map` instead of `/netbox/static/netbox.js.map`. The problem appears to be this line: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/6845fb0f005f0bdc15a258ae2ebd7f9be5341f76/netbox/project-static/dist/netbox.js#L67 Perhaps due to this? https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/6845fb0f005f0bdc15a258ae2ebd7f9be5341f76/netbox/project-static/bundle.js#L11 Changing `sourceMappingURL=/static/netbox.js.map` to `sourceMappingURL=netbox.js.map` appears to work, at least for this particular file.
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedbeta labels 2025-12-29 19:24:53 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:24:53 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:24:54 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2021):

I don't have any issues loading Javascript resources using the current feature build with a non-default BASE_PATH, however I do see that the Material Design Icons font is being hard-coded to /static/. It also looks like we're pulling the Inter font from fonts.gstatic.com instead of locally.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2021): I don't have any issues loading Javascript resources using the current `feature` build with a non-default `BASE_PATH`, however I do see that the Material Design Icons font is being hard-coded to `/static/`. It also looks like we're pulling the Inter font from fonts.gstatic.com instead of locally.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:24:54 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@m2martin commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021):

Shouldn't it be avoided to have mixed sources (local statics and external includes)?
In case of the font, this shouldn't cause any problems, as the Open Fonts License for Inter grants copying, embedding and redistributing.
Background: I do have Netbox instances where the clients are not allowed to access external resources.
What's your opinion?

@m2martin commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021): Shouldn't it be avoided to have mixed sources (local statics and external includes)? In case of the font, this shouldn't cause any problems, as the [Open Fonts License](https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL) for `Inter` grants copying, embedding and redistributing. Background: I do have Netbox instances where the clients are not allowed to access external resources. What's your opinion?
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:24:54 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021):

Shouldn't it be avoided to have mixed sources (local statics and external includes)?

Yes; NetBox is designed to deliver all static assets locally, to support installations with no Internet access.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021): > Shouldn't it be avoided to have mixed sources (local statics and external includes)? Yes; NetBox is designed to deliver all static assets locally, to support installations with no Internet access.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label beta status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5157
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?