Visual bug. After edited or deleted custom field, bulk create and edit will keep the custom field in display field (not attribute) #5103

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:24:14 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jk-onnet on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v2.11.7 (tested on demo instance too)

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Add custom field "vmid" in virtualization (admin)
  2. Edit custom field "vmid" name in virtualization (admin)
  3. Add custom field "core" name in virtualization (admin)
  4. Delete custom field "core" name in virtualization (admin)
  5. Bulk edit or delete in virtualization page

Expected Behavior

image

Observed Behavior

image

Originally created by @jk-onnet on GitHub (Jul 27, 2021). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v2.11.7 (tested on demo instance too) ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Add custom field "vmid" in virtualization (admin) 2. Edit custom field "vmid" name in virtualization (admin) 3. Add custom field "core" name in virtualization (admin) 4. Delete custom field "core" name in virtualization (admin) 5. Bulk edit or delete in virtualization page ### Expected Behavior ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/85537520/127088207-cec395d2-0738-4487-bb86-934edf569e65.png) ### Observed Behavior ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/85537520/127088237-3d230d43-6179-4616-92de-5844429271cb.png)
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 19:24:14 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:24:14 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2021):

For clarification of the reproduction instructions, the user needs to add the custom fields under the object table configuration for them to appear.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 16, 2021): For clarification of the reproduction instructions, the user needs to add the custom fields under the object table configuration for them to appear.
Author
Owner

@opericgithub commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2021):

#7310 might be similar to this, but not quite same. anyway, i hope this issue will be resolved sometime soon.

@opericgithub commented on GitHub (Sep 29, 2021): #7310 might be similar to this, but not quite same. anyway, i hope this issue will be resolved sometime soon.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5103