starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Configuration context assiged by VLAN #5008

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jcralbino on GitHub (Jun 17, 2021).

NetBox version

v2.11.4

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Allow the assignment of a configuration context using a vlan.
Whenever a VLAN assigned to a device interface the associated configuration context will be assigned to it

Currently the configuration context is assigned based on Regions, Site Groups, Sites, Device Types, Roles, Platforms, Cluster Groups, Clusters, Tenant Groups, Tenants and Tags.

This will add another field in order to fine tune the utilization of this feature.

Use case

It allows to document better the required network configuration a device needs to have depending of its associated vlan.

Database changes

none

External dependencies

none

Originally created by @jcralbino on GitHub (Jun 17, 2021). ### NetBox version v2.11.4 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Allow the assignment of a configuration context using a vlan. Whenever a VLAN assigned to a device interface the associated configuration context will be assigned to it Currently the configuration context is assigned based on Regions, Site Groups, Sites, Device Types, Roles, Platforms, Cluster Groups, Clusters, Tenant Groups, Tenants and Tags. This will add another field in order to fine tune the utilization of this feature. ### Use case It allows to document better the required network configuration a device needs to have depending of its associated vlan. ### Database changes none ### External dependencies none
adam added the type: featurestatus: duplicate labels 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2021):

What have you opened this in addition to #6340? As I explained here this is not feasible without making disruptive changes to the data model.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 17, 2021): What have you opened this in addition to #6340? As I explained [here](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/6340#issuecomment-853250277) this is not feasible without making disruptive changes to the data model.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:23:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jcralbino commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2021):

Indeed it seems a duplicate one.. I just opened yesterday when I was configuring some devices and the change in the filter seemed logic.
Please close this one

@jcralbino commented on GitHub (Jun 18, 2021): Indeed it seems a duplicate one.. I just opened yesterday when I was configuring some devices and the change in the filter seemed logic. Please close this one
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: duplicate type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5008
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?