starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Nested inventory items are not displayed correctly #4992

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:22:57 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:57 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @kr3ator on GitHub (Jun 10, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v2.11.3

Python version

3.8

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Add an inventory item, e.g. server0
  2. Create some more child elements to the previous element, e.g. cpu, ram, slot0, slot1
  3. Created new inventory items (item0, item1) for each of slot0 and slot1

Expected Behavior

Invetory view should display all inventory items sorted alphabetically starting from the top most item to the last child element adding correct indentation.

server0
-cpu
-ram
-slot0
--item0
--item1
-slot1
--item0
--item1

Observed Behavior

All items have correct indentation level but they are sorted alphabetically regardless of the structure

-cpu
--item0
--item0
--item1
--item1
-ram
server0
-slot0
-slot1

Originally created by @kr3ator on GitHub (Jun 10, 2021). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v2.11.3 ### Python version 3.8 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Add an inventory item, e.g. server0 2. Create some more child elements to the previous element, e.g. cpu, ram, slot0, slot1 3. Created new inventory items (item0, item1) for each of slot0 and slot1 ### Expected Behavior Invetory view should display all inventory items sorted alphabetically starting from the top most item to the last child element adding correct indentation. server0 -cpu -ram -slot0 --item0 --item1 -slot1 --item0 --item1 ### Observed Behavior All items have correct indentation level but they are sorted alphabetically regardless of the structure -cpu --item0 --item0 --item1 --item1 -ram server0 -slot0 -slot1
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 19:22:57 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:22:57 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 10, 2021):

Looks like we were inadvertently overwriting MPTT's ordering logic in the table. Easy fix. Thanks for the heads up!

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 10, 2021): Looks like we were inadvertently overwriting MPTT's ordering logic in the table. Easy fix. Thanks for the heads up!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4992
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?