starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add possibility to assign cluster to Site Group #4915

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:22:14 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:14 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ziggekatten on GitHub (May 17, 2021).

NetBox version

v2.11.3

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Currently a cluster is always tied to a Site. For stretched clusters (nodes in more than one data center) it would make sense to assign the cluster to a site group.

Use case

We are running VMware clusters with vSAN over stretched L2 networks between sites. We also run Fortigate FW clusters with nodes in each DC. Being able to model this on site group level would enable us to use the new features on 2.11(Site Groups) that we today can't use, and are today modeling by using one site for both sites, and Rack Groups(Location in 2.11) to distinguish the physical site.

Database changes

Probably a relation to Site Group instead of SIte, so I'm not sure any DB-changes are needed

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @ziggekatten on GitHub (May 17, 2021). ### NetBox version v2.11.3 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Currently a cluster is always tied to a Site. For stretched clusters (nodes in more than one data center) it would make sense to assign the cluster to a site group. ### Use case We are running VMware clusters with vSAN over stretched L2 networks between sites. We also run Fortigate FW clusters with nodes in each DC. Being able to model this on site group level would enable us to use the new features on 2.11(Site Groups) that we today can't use, and are today modeling by using one site for both sites, and Rack Groups(Location in 2.11) to distinguish the physical site. ### Database changes Probably a relation to Site Group instead of SIte, so I'm not sure any DB-changes are needed ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurepending closurestatus: under review labels 2025-12-29 19:22:14 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:22:14 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:14 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021):

Marking as blocked until we figure out whether there's a more optimal way to track multi-model parent assignments (see #6440).

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 18, 2021): Marking as blocked until we figure out whether there's a more optimal way to track multi-model parent assignments (see #6440).
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:15 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mazhead commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2021):

@jeremystretch #6440 got closed, can we maybe revisit this one?

@mazhead commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2021): @jeremystretch #6440 got closed, can we maybe revisit this one?
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:15 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2022):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Do not attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 1, 2022): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. **Do not** attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:22:15 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2022):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2022): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: under review type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4915
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?