starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add interface type for SFP56 (50GE) #4769

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:20:17 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:20:17 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @do9xe on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021).

NetBox version

v2.11.0-beta

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

Hello Team,

we have found a false speed in the transceiver-list of the public netbox beta.
In the list are two QSPF28 Transceivers with 50G and 100G, but there should be only one with 100G. Also the Transceiver-Type SFP56 (50G) is missing. We have proposed an update to this List.

Thanks for the awesome project,
Adrian & Hendrik

Port-Speed

Expected Behavior

Correct values for all interface types

Observed Behavior

false values for some interface types

Originally created by @do9xe on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021). ### NetBox version v2.11.0-beta ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce Hello Team, we have found a false speed in the transceiver-list of the [public netbox beta](beta.netbox.de). In the list are two QSPF28 Transceivers with 50G and 100G, but there should be only one with 100G. Also the Transceiver-Type `SFP56 (50G)` is missing. We have proposed an update to this List. Thanks for the awesome project, Adrian & Hendrik ![Port-Speed](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6275838/114903774-6c19d200-9e17-11eb-83be-9460e462b6d9.png) ### Expected Behavior Correct values for all interface types ### Observed Behavior false values for some interface types
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 19:20:17 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:20:17 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:20:17 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021):

In the list are two QSPF28 Transceivers with 50G and 100G, but there should be only one with 100G.

QSFP28 also supports 50GE. It belongs in the list.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021): > In the list are two QSPF28 Transceivers with 50G and 100G, but there should be only one with 100G. QSFP28 also [supports 50GE](https://www.fs.com/c/50g-qsfp28-3793). It belongs in the list.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:20:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021):

FYI this was opened against v2.11-beta but has been added under v2.10 (develop).

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 15, 2021): FYI this was opened against v2.11-beta but has been added under v2.10 (`develop`).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4769
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?