starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Virtual Machine Interfaces table should be moved to separate tab #4683

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:19:27 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:19:27 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @cpmills1975 on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v2.10.7

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

All of the component tables on Devices have moved from the device page to separate tabs. I'm proposing that the Interfaces table for Virtual Machines also becomes its own tab to mimic the Device page.

Use case

While most users probably aren't dealing with huge lists of interfaces on Virtual Machines, the UX should be as consistent as possible between Devices and Virtual Machines.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @cpmills1975 on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v2.10.7 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality All of the component tables on Devices have moved from the device page to separate tabs. I'm proposing that the Interfaces table for Virtual Machines also becomes its own tab to mimic the Device page. ### Use case While most users probably aren't dealing with huge lists of interfaces on Virtual Machines, the UX should be as consistent as possible between Devices and Virtual Machines. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: housekeeping labels 2025-12-29 19:19:27 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:19:27 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:19:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2021):

I agree, however the UI is currently in flux pending the v2.12 work. Going to mark this as blocked for now and tag it for v2.12.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2021): I agree, however the UI is currently in flux pending the v2.12 work. Going to mark this as blocked for now and tag it for v2.12.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:19:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cpmills1975 commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2021):

As soon as there is a clone-able version with the UI improvements in it, I'd been keen to take it for a spin in my dev environment. Is this likely to be on the devel branch after the release of 2.11 or are you thinking of running a separate branch for the UI changes?

@cpmills1975 commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2021): As soon as there is a clone-able version with the UI improvements in it, I'd been keen to take it for a spin in my dev environment. Is this likely to be on the devel branch after the release of 2.11 or are you thinking of running a separate branch for the UI changes?
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:19:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2021):

We decided to push the UI overhaul to v2.12, so I'm going to knock this out shortly.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 26, 2021): We decided to push the UI overhaul to v2.12, so I'm going to knock this out shortly.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:19:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2021):

Fixing this under v2.11 since we've tweaked the generic templates a good bit already.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2021): Fixing this under v2.11 since we've tweaked the generic templates a good bit already.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: housekeeping
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4683
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?