Add utilization bar to Power panels #4657

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:19:14 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @991jo on GitHub (Mar 13, 2021).

NetBox version

v2.10.3

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

Power feeds have a utilization bar that shows how much of the power is used by the devices plugged into that feed.
Power panels should also have a maximum power and a utilization bar because the power a panel can deliver is also limited and that limit might be lower than the sum of the feeds that belong to that panel. The allocated power usage of a power panel would be the sum of the allocated power of all it's feeds.

Use case

make sure that the total amount of power used by all feeds does not exceed the amount a power panel can handle.

Database changes

Add a "maximum power" field to the power panel

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @991jo on GitHub (Mar 13, 2021). ### NetBox version v2.10.3 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality Power feeds have a utilization bar that shows how much of the power is used by the devices plugged into that feed. Power panels should also have a maximum power and a utilization bar because the power a panel can deliver is also limited and that limit might be lower than the sum of the feeds that belong to that panel. The allocated power usage of a power panel would be the sum of the allocated power of all it's feeds. ### Use case make sure that the total amount of power used by all feeds does not exceed the amount a power panel can handle. ### Database changes Add a "maximum power" field to the power panel ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurepending closure labels 2025-12-29 19:19:14 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:19:14 +01:00
Author
Owner

@robbat2 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021):

  • How do you propose to handle devices with multiple power inputs, which might be driven by different feeds?
  • I'm not sure this overall is representative of the real world: e.g. my local panel has a 100A breaker on the supply side, and then 450A worth of 15A/30A breakers.
@robbat2 commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021): - How do you propose to handle devices with multiple power inputs, which might be driven by different feeds? - I'm not sure this overall is representative of the real world: e.g. my local panel has a 100A breaker on the supply side, and then 450A worth of 15A/30A breakers.
Author
Owner

@991jo commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021):

I assume you mean that you have are talking about devices with multiple power inputs that are redundant and that are connected to different feeds but end up on the same power panel? The way I proposed it each of the inputs would be counted even when n reality only one of them will see that load.

The amount of power your panel has only supply side vs. the allocated power on the feeds/devices on that panel is exactly what I am interesetd in. Of course the amount of power the breakers in your can be bigger that the supply side, but you dont want to connect more devices to that panel has supply for. Currently netbox does not tell you how much power you have allocated in total on a power feed.

@991jo commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2021): I assume you mean that you have are talking about devices with multiple power inputs that are redundant and that are connected to different feeds but end up on the same power panel? The way I proposed it each of the inputs would be counted even when n reality only one of them will see that load. The amount of power your panel has only supply side vs. the allocated power on the feeds/devices on that panel is exactly what I am interesetd in. Of course the amount of power the breakers in your can be bigger that the supply side, but you dont want to connect more devices to that panel has supply for. Currently netbox does not tell you how much power you have allocated in total on a power feed.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2021):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 29, 2021): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4657