starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Unable to sort VMs by primary_ip #4568

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:37:44 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:37:44 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @stuntguy3000 on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.6.8
  • NetBox version: 2.10.4

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Sort virtual machines by IP Address
    https://[address]/virtualization/virtual-machines/?sort=primary_ip

Expected Behavior

VMs to be sorted.

Observed Behavior

Application crash.

<class 'django.core.exceptions.FieldError'>

Cannot resolve keyword 'primary_ip' into field. Choices are: cluster, cluster_id, comments, created, custom_field_data, disk, id, interfaces, last_updated, local_context_data, memory, name, platform, platform_id, primary_ip4, primary_ip4_id, primary_ip6, primary_ip6_id, role, role_id, secrets, services, status, tagged_items, tags, tenant, tenant_id, vcpus

Python version: 3.6.8
NetBox version: 2.10.4

Same bug as #5597

Originally created by @stuntguy3000 on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021). <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for reporting reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, please start a discussion instead: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/discussions Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report, and that any plugins have been disabled. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.6.8 * NetBox version: 2.10.4 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Sort virtual machines by IP Address https://[address]/virtualization/virtual-machines/?sort=primary_ip <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior VMs to be sorted. <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior Application crash. ``` <class 'django.core.exceptions.FieldError'> Cannot resolve keyword 'primary_ip' into field. Choices are: cluster, cluster_id, comments, created, custom_field_data, disk, id, interfaces, last_updated, local_context_data, memory, name, platform, platform_id, primary_ip4, primary_ip4_id, primary_ip6, primary_ip6_id, role, role_id, secrets, services, status, tagged_items, tags, tenant, tenant_id, vcpus Python version: 3.6.8 NetBox version: 2.10.4 ``` Same bug as #5597
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 18:37:44 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:37:44 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:37:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

This also happens when you sort devices by primary ip

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): This also happens when you sort devices by primary ip
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:37:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021):

This also happens when you sort devices by primary ip

This was fixed in #5597, and is resolved in the latest release (2.10.4), see above for details.

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2021): > This also happens when you sort devices by primary ip This was fixed in #5597, and is resolved in the latest release (2.10.4), see above for details.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:37:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2021):

@stuntguy3000 I don't understand your comment above. #5819 is this issue.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2021): @stuntguy3000 I don't understand your comment above. #5819 is this issue.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:37:46 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2021):

@stuntguy3000 I don't understand your comment above. #5819 is this issue.

Whoops, corrected - meant to reference 5597 as in the original post.

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2021): > @stuntguy3000 I don't understand your comment above. #5819 is this issue. Whoops, corrected - meant to reference 5597 as in the original post.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4568
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?