IP address creation is incosistent in automatic VRF/Tenant assignment #4560

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:37:36 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @Kircheneer on GitHub (Feb 12, 2021).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.9.1
  • NetBox version: v2.10.4

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a tenant 'Test'
  2. Create a VRF 'Test'
  3. Create a prefix '10.0.0.0/24' within the created tenant and VRF
    At this point the inconsistency starts. When clicking on the green plus icon in the top right to add an IP address, the tenant and VRF are pre-filled. When clicking on the 'xyz IPs available' button in the table, they are not pre-filled.

Expected Behavior

Pre-filled VRF and tenant for both buttons.

Observed Behavior

Inconsistency. Pre-filling for green plus, no pre-filling for button in the table.

Originally created by @Kircheneer on GitHub (Feb 12, 2021). ### Environment * Python version: 3.9.1 * NetBox version: v2.10.4 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a tenant 'Test' 2. Create a VRF 'Test' 3. Create a prefix '10.0.0.0/24' within the created tenant and VRF At this point the inconsistency starts. When clicking on the green plus icon in the top right to add an IP address, the tenant and VRF are pre-filled. When clicking on the 'xyz IPs available' button in the table, they are not pre-filled. ### Expected Behavior Pre-filled VRF and tenant for both buttons. ### Observed Behavior Inconsistency. Pre-filling for green plus, no pre-filling for button in the table.
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 18:37:36 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:37:36 +01:00
Author
Owner

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021):

Duplicate of #5703

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2021): Duplicate of #5703
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4560