starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

vlan assignment to interfaces upon bulk edit clears previouslly assigned ones #4510

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:36:51 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:51 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @LuPo on GitHub (Jan 28, 2021).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.9.1
  • NetBox version: 2.10.4

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Configure interfaces 1-5,11-15 on VLAN A
  2. Configure interfaces 6-10,16-20 on VLAN B
  3. Bulk edit interfaces 1-20 and add VLAN C
  4. Do not flag "set null" option

Expected Behavior

  1. Interfaces 1-5,11-15 with taggd VLANS A and C
  2. Interfaces 6-10,16-20 with taggd VLANS B and C

Observed Behavior

all of the above interfaces have only VLAN C

Originally created by @LuPo on GitHub (Jan 28, 2021). ### Environment * Python version: 3.9.1 * NetBox version: 2.10.4 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Configure interfaces 1-5,11-15 on VLAN A 2. Configure interfaces 6-10,16-20 on VLAN B 3. Bulk edit interfaces 1-20 and add VLAN C 4. Do not flag "set null" option ### Expected Behavior 1. Interfaces 1-5,11-15 with taggd VLANS A and C 2. Interfaces 6-10,16-20 with taggd VLANS B and C ### Observed Behavior all of the above interfaces have only VLAN C
adam added the type: featurestatus: needs ownerpending closure labels 2025-12-29 18:36:51 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:36:51 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2021):

I have not dove into it too much, but this might be a limitation of DJango. I believe the bulk edit is a replace operation, even on multichoice fields.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2021): I have not dove into it too much, but this might be a limitation of DJango. I believe the bulk edit is a replace operation, even on multichoice fields.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2021): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2021):

The current behavior simply sets the assigned VLANs, replacing any that were already assigned as @DanSheps alluded. To alter this behavior, we would need to introduce separate "add" and "remove" fields to the bulk edit form, as exist for tags.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2021): The current behavior simply sets the assigned VLANs, replacing any that were already assigned as @DanSheps alluded. To alter this behavior, we would need to introduce separate "add" and "remove" fields to the bulk edit form, as exist for tags.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 24, 2021):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 24, 2021): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:36:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2021):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jun 24, 2021): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: needs owner type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4510
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?