Export Cables issue #4083

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:33:01 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @LarsSche on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.8
  • NetBox version: 2.9.3

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Go to Devices --> cables
  2. Click on export
  3. Look in the csv file

Expected Behavior

I expected to see in the columns "termination_a_type", "termination_a_id", "termination_b_type", "termination_b_id"
the device name and assigned ports.

Observed Behavior

I just see:
dcim.rearport,266,dcim.rearport,217
No device or port assignments.

For example:
termination_a_type,termination_a_id,termination_b_type,termination_b_id,type,status,label,color,length,length_unit
dcim.rearport,266,dcim.rearport,217,Multimode Fiber (OM2),Connected,,ff9800,,
dcim.rearport,268,dcim.rearport,269,Multimode Fiber (OM2),Connected,,ff9800,,

Originally created by @LarsSche on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020). <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report, and that any plugins have been disabled. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.8 * NetBox version: 2.9.3 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Go to Devices --> cables 2. Click on export 3. Look in the csv file <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior I expected to see in the columns "termination_a_type", "termination_a_id", "termination_b_type", "termination_b_id" the device name and assigned ports. <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior I just see: dcim.rearport,266,dcim.rearport,217 No device or port assignments. For example: termination_a_type,termination_a_id,termination_b_type,termination_b_id,type,status,label,color,length,length_unit dcim.rearport,266,dcim.rearport,217,Multimode Fiber (OM2),Connected,,ff9800,, dcim.rearport,268,dcim.rearport,269,Multimode Fiber (OM2),Connected,,ff9800,,
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:33:01 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020):

Thank you for opening a bug report. It seems that the described functionality is intended behavior. If you meant to open a feature request instead, please close this issue and open a new one using the feature request template. Otherwise, please revise your post above to elaborate on why you believe the observed behavior is flawed.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2020): Thank you for opening a bug report. It seems that the described functionality is intended behavior. If you meant to open a feature request instead, please close this issue and open a new one using the [feature request template](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/new?template=feature_request.md). Otherwise, please revise your post above to elaborate on why you believe the observed behavior is flawed.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4083