starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Support bulk relabelling of ports in the same manner as bulk renaming #4061

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:32:55 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:55 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @cpmills1975 on GitHub (Sep 1, 2020).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.7
  • NetBox version: 2.9.2

Proposed Functionality

It would be helpful if it was possible to bulk re-label ports in a similar fashion to how they can currently be bulk re-named.

Use Case

Since ports can be bulk created, named and labelled, a typo introduced in the name field while bulk creating them can be resolved fairly quickly through bulk re-naming. A typo in the label field would require each field to be edited individually.

Database Changes

None

External Dependencies

None

Originally created by @cpmills1975 on GitHub (Sep 1, 2020). <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for proposing specific new features or enhancements. If you have a general idea or question, please post to our mailing list instead of opening an issue: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss NOTE: Due to an excessive backlog of feature requests, we are not currently accepting any proposals which significantly extend NetBox's feature scope. Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.7 * NetBox version: 2.9.2 <!-- Describe in detail the new functionality you are proposing. Include any specific changes to work flows, data models, or the user interface. --> ### Proposed Functionality It would be helpful if it was possible to bulk re-label ports in a similar fashion to how they can currently be bulk re-named. <!-- Convey an example use case for your proposed feature. Write from the perspective of a NetBox user who would benefit from the proposed functionality and describe how. ---> ### Use Case Since ports can be bulk created, named and labelled, a typo introduced in the name field while bulk creating them can be resolved fairly quickly through bulk re-naming. A typo in the label field would require each field to be edited individually. <!-- Note any changes to the database schema necessary to support the new feature. For example, does the proposal require adding a new model or field? (Not all new features require database changes.) ---> ### Database Changes None <!-- List any new dependencies on external libraries or services that this new feature would introduce. For example, does the proposal require the installation of a new Python package? (Not all new features introduce new dependencies.) --> ### External Dependencies None
adam added the type: featurestatus: needs ownerpending closure labels 2025-12-29 18:32:55 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:32:55 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:55 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@lampwins commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2020):

I suppose we could extend the same logic and expose it through the name re-naming form, so you do both at the same time.

@lampwins commented on GitHub (Sep 26, 2020): I suppose we could extend the same logic and expose it through the name re-naming form, so you do both at the same time.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2020):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 27, 2020): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cpmills1975 commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021):

Please keep this open, I’d still like to see this functionality in a future version and it seems there is some support for the idea?

On 29 May 2021, at 05:51, github-actions[bot] @.***> wrote:


This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

@cpmills1975 commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021): Please keep this open, I’d still like to see this functionality in a future version and it seems there is some support for the idea? > On 29 May 2021, at 05:51, github-actions[bot] ***@***.***> wrote: > >  > This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021):

@cpmills1975 would you like to volunteer to implement it?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 29, 2021): @cpmills1975 would you like to volunteer to implement it?
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:32:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2021):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2021): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: needs owner type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#4061
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?