starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Missing total count of front ports on device types view in 2.9-beta1 #3901

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:31:53 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:31:53 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @dare-to-recurse on GitHub (Jul 27, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

Environment

  • Python version: 3.8.0
  • NetBox version: 2.9-beta1
  • PostgreSQL version: 10.6
  • Redis version: 5.0.3
  • nginx version: 1.14.1

The following steps were tested in a clean install of netbox 2.9-beta1 on a up-to-date CentOS 8 install.
Verified to occur with the following browsers to (try to) rule out client-side bugs

  • Chrome: 83.0.4103.116 (Official Build) (64-bit)
  • Firefox: 78.0.2 (64-bit)
  • Edge: 84.0.522.44 (Official Build) (64-bit)

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a manufacturer 'test'
  2. Create a device type 'test'
  3. Create rear ports '[1-4]' with one position each
  4. Create front ports '[1-4]' corresponding to the created rear ports

Expected Behavior

Front ports tab on the device type view to display a total count of front ports.

Observed Behavior

Front ports tab on the device type view does not display a total count.
All other tabs display this correctly.

Originally created by @dare-to-recurse on GitHub (Jul 27, 2020). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report, and that any plugins have been disabled. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.8.0 * NetBox version: 2.9-beta1 * PostgreSQL version: 10.6 * Redis version: 5.0.3 * nginx version: 1.14.1 The following steps were tested in a clean install of netbox 2.9-beta1 on a up-to-date CentOS 8 install. Verified to occur with the following browsers to (try to) rule out client-side bugs * Chrome: 83.0.4103.116 (Official Build) (64-bit) * Firefox: 78.0.2 (64-bit) * Edge: 84.0.522.44 (Official Build) (64-bit) <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a manufacturer 'test' 2. Create a device type 'test' 3. Create rear ports '[1-4]' with one position each 4. Create front ports '[1-4]' corresponding to the created rear ports <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior Front ports tab on the device type view to display a total count of front ports. <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior Front ports tab on the device type view does not display a total count. All other tabs display this correctly.
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedbeta labels 2025-12-29 18:31:53 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:31:53 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:31:53 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2020):

Whoops. This is indeed a template error. Sorry @dare-to-recurse, when I looked at it last week I must have been looking at the device template mistakenly. Apologies, and thank you for the thorough bug report!

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 27, 2020): Whoops. This is indeed a template error. Sorry @dare-to-recurse, when I looked at it last week I must have been looking at the device template mistakenly. Apologies, and thank you for the thorough bug report!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label beta status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3901
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?