starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Interface assignment get lost after IP address "create and add another" #3678

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @JulianJacobi on GitHub (May 12, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

Environment

  • Python version: 3.7 (should be on any)
  • NetBox version: 2.8.3

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Disable any installed plugins by commenting out the PLUGINS setting in
    configuration.py.
  2. Navigate to any device with an interface
  3. Click the + at the and of the interface row in the interface table to add an IP address to an interface
  4. Fill out the form and click "Create and add another"

Expected Behavior

  • Another IP address form with filled out interface assignment appears.
  • interface GET-parameter is set to the appropriate interface-ID.

Observed Behavior

  • Another IP address form without filled out interface assignment appears.
  • interface GET-parameter is missing.

Further information

With the implementation of clone able models in the ObjectEditView.post() function the redirection GET-parameters are build only from clone_fields and other maybe existing GET-parameters are fully ignored.

Originally created by @JulianJacobi on GitHub (May 12, 2020). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report, and that any plugins have been disabled. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.7 (should be on any) * NetBox version: 2.8.3 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Disable any installed plugins by commenting out the `PLUGINS` setting in `configuration.py`. 2. Navigate to any device with an interface 3. Click the + at the and of the interface row in the interface table to add an IP address to an interface 4. Fill out the form and click "Create and add another" <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior - Another IP address form with filled out interface assignment appears. - `interface` GET-parameter is set to the appropriate interface-ID. <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior - Another IP address form without filled out interface assignment appears. - `interface` GET-parameter is missing. ### Further information With the implementation of clone able models in the `ObjectEditView.post()` function the redirection GET-parameters are build only from clone_fields and other maybe existing GET-parameters are fully ignored.
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 13, 2020):

Please specify the exact release on which this issue can be reproduced.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 13, 2020): Please specify the exact release on which this issue can be reproduced.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JulianJacobi commented on GitHub (May 13, 2020):

The issue first appeared in v2.8.0 but is already there in v2.8.3

@JulianJacobi commented on GitHub (May 13, 2020): The issue first appeared in v2.8.0 but is already there in v2.8.3
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3678
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?