starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add Cx type power outlets #3621

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @raddessi on GitHub (Apr 29, 2020).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.6.2
  • NetBox version: 2.7.11

Proposed Functionality

There is a proprietary power outlet type introduced by ServerTech that accepts either a C14 or C20 connector, they refer to it as Cx. Article here. It is receptacle only so we would only need to add the outlet, no ports.

Use Case

I would like to be able to doc these outlets without jumping through hoops. I actually wrote up the change and was about to send it as a PR before I saw the instruction to open a FR first. If you wish you can see that branch here

Database Changes

None afaik, the only references to C13 I saw were fields only.

External Dependencies

None

Originally created by @raddessi on GitHub (Apr 29, 2020). ### Environment * Python version: 3.6.2 * NetBox version: 2.7.11 <!-- Describe in detail the new functionality you are proposing. Include any specific changes to work flows, data models, or the user interface. --> ### Proposed Functionality There is a proprietary power outlet type introduced by ServerTech that accepts either a C14 or C20 connector, they refer to it as Cx. Article [here](https://www.legrand.us/aboutus/press-room/news/server-technologys-hdot-cx-future-proofs-data-center-pdu-investments.aspx). It is receptacle only so we would only need to add the outlet, no ports. ### Use Case I would like to be able to doc these outlets without jumping through hoops. I actually wrote up the change and was about to send it as a PR before I saw the instruction to open a FR first. If you wish you can see that branch [here](https://github.com/raddessi/netbox/tree/master.cx-power-ports) ### Database Changes None afaik, the only references to `C13` I saw were fields only. ### External Dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020):

I'm going to add this under a new "proprietary" group. Doesn't seem right to add it under IEC 60320 since it's not part of the spec.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020): I'm going to add this under a new "proprietary" group. Doesn't seem right to add it under IEC 60320 since it's not part of the spec.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@raddessi commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020):

That's what I had in my change isn't it? https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/compare/develop...raddessi:master.cx-power-ports?expand=1

@raddessi commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020): That's what I had in my change isn't it? https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/compare/develop...raddessi:master.cx-power-ports?expand=1
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@raddessi commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020):

Love it, thanks!

@raddessi commented on GitHub (Apr 30, 2020): Love it, thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3621
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?