Inherited tenant prefixes not being counted under tenants #362

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:21:18 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @colawebrunner on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016).

If a prefix has an inherited tenant, then the count of prefixes doesn't show under the tenant, only the prefixes specifically own by the tenant. Is this expected behavior?

Originally created by @colawebrunner on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016). If a prefix has an inherited tenant, then the count of prefixes doesn't show under the tenant, only the prefixes specifically own by the tenant. Is this expected behavior?
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 16:21:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:21:18 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016):

It's a known limitation at the moment. I need to do some testing to see how much of a performance hit we take in calculating inherited tenancy for prefixes and IPs.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016): It's a known limitation at the moment. I need to do some testing to see how much of a performance hit we take in calculating inherited tenancy for prefixes and IPs.
Author
Owner

@colawebrunner commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016):

Ok, thanks for coming back to me.

@colawebrunner commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2016): Ok, thanks for coming back to me.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#362