starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Rack unit tenants #3616

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:30:11 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:11 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @kmorin18 on GitHub (Apr 28, 2020).

Environment

N/A

Proposed Functionality

Extend the "tenant" feature on a "per U" basis.

Currently, the "tenant" feature only allows users to assign a tenant to a full cabinet.
It would be nice to be able to set tenant X in U's 1-20 in rack A.

A workaround is to set a reservation, but it makes it so the reservation feature can't be used.

Use Case

Allow users to set tenants on a "per rack unit" basis. Practical for data center colocation providers.

Database Changes

N/A

External Dependencies

N/A

Originally created by @kmorin18 on GitHub (Apr 28, 2020). <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for proposing specific new features or enhancements. If you have a general idea or question, please post to our mailing list instead of opening an issue: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss NOTE: Due to an excessive backlog of feature requests, we are not currently accepting any proposals which significantly extend NetBox's feature scope. Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report. --> ### Environment N/A ### Proposed Functionality Extend the "tenant" feature on a "per U" basis. Currently, the "tenant" feature only allows users to assign a tenant to a full cabinet. It would be nice to be able to set tenant X in U's 1-20 in rack A. A workaround is to set a reservation, but it makes it so the reservation feature can't be used. ### Use Case Allow users to set tenants on a "per rack unit" basis. Practical for data center colocation providers. ### Database Changes N/A ### External Dependencies N/A
adam added the pending closure label 2025-12-29 18:30:11 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:30:11 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2020):

Thank you for the suggestion, however this would be too stark a departure from the established data model. It is recommended to assign tenants to racks only when the entire rack belongs to the tenant; otherwise, the tenant assignment is done at the device level.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 28, 2020): Thank you for the suggestion, however this would be too stark a departure from the established data model. It is recommended to assign tenants to racks only when the entire rack belongs to the tenant; otherwise, the tenant assignment is done at the device level.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:30:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 12, 2020):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 12, 2020): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3616
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?