CustomFieldChoice queryset in custom scripts throws django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch exception #3583

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:30:00 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @benjy44 on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @kobayashi on GitHub.

Environment

  • Python version: 3.6
  • NetBox version: 2.8.0

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a custom field in the administration panel
  2. Create a custom script with an ObjectVar using queryset=CustomFieldChoice.objects.all()
  3. Click on the newly created script in /extras/scripts/

Expected Behavior

The script form shows up

Observed Behavior

exception:

<class 'django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch'>

Reverse for 'customfieldchoice-list' not found. 'customfieldchoice-list' is not a valid view function or pattern name.

It also fails for CustomField and CustomFieldValue, It was working fine at least in 2.7.3

Originally created by @benjy44 on GitHub (Apr 19, 2020). Originally assigned to: @kobayashi on GitHub. <!-- NOTE: IF YOUR ISSUE DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE, IT WILL BE CLOSED. This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report, and that any plugins have been disabled. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.6 * NetBox version: 2.8.0 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox. Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a client library such as pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a custom field in the administration panel 2. Create a custom script with an ObjectVar using `queryset=CustomFieldChoice.objects.all()` 3. Click on the newly created script in /extras/scripts/ <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior The script form shows up <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior exception: ``` <class 'django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch'> Reverse for 'customfieldchoice-list' not found. 'customfieldchoice-list' is not a valid view function or pattern name. ``` It also fails for CustomField and CustomFieldValue, It was working fine at least in 2.7.3
adam added the pending closure label 2025-12-29 18:30:00 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:30:00 +01:00
Author
Owner

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2020):

I don't believe there are any endpoints for custom fields, which is probably the root cause of this.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Apr 27, 2020): I don't believe there are any endpoints for custom fields, which is probably the root cause of this.
Author
Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 11, 2020):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 11, 2020): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
Author
Owner

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 18, 2020):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@stale[bot] commented on GitHub (May 18, 2020): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3583