starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Getting prefixes by vrf name fails #3484

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:29:27 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:27 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Dimaqa on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020).

Environment

Python version: 3.6.9
NetBox version: 2.7.6, same behavior on 2.7.9-dev

Steps to Reproduce

GET /api/ipam/prefixes/?vrf=FOR-TESTS

Probably its a swagger bug and you cant really get prefixes by vrf name directrly (There are two fields: vrf and vrf_id), because if you search through netbox unterface, it replaces vrf name with id in query

Observed Behavior

400 Bad Request: {'vrf': ['Select a valid choice. TEST-VRF is not one of the available choices.']}

Originally created by @Dimaqa on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020). ### Environment Python version: 3.6.9 NetBox version: 2.7.6, same behavior on 2.7.9-dev ### Steps to Reproduce GET /api/ipam/prefixes/?vrf=FOR-TESTS Probably its a swagger bug and you cant really get prefixes by vrf name directrly (There are two fields: vrf and vrf_id), because if you search through netbox unterface, it replaces vrf name with id in query ### Observed Behavior 400 Bad Request: {'vrf': ['Select a valid choice. TEST-VRF is not one of the available choices.']}
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:29:27 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:27 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

NetBox version: develop

We do not accept bug reports for anything other than a recent stable release. Please attempt to reproduce the behavior on a current release and update your issue accordingly.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): > NetBox version: develop We do not accept bug reports for anything other than a recent stable release. Please attempt to reproduce the behavior on a current release and update your issue accordingly.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:27 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

Same behavior on 2.7.6 and 2.7.9-dev

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): Same behavior on 2.7.6 and 2.7.9-dev
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

Getting prefixes by vrf name makes things awkward if we have 2 vrf with the same name. So maybe you should just delete this field from swagger. Also rename vrf to vrf_id on creation would be nice, because this naming breaks my mind every time

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): Getting prefixes by vrf name makes things awkward if we have 2 vrf with the same name. So maybe you should just delete this field from swagger. Also rename vrf to vrf_id on creation would be nice, because this naming breaks my mind every time
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

The vrf filter references VRF objects by RD, not by name.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): The ` vrf` filter references VRF objects by RD, not by name.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

Thank you! But but thats really strange way to name RD, since vrf is vrf_id on creation (POST).

@Dimaqa commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): Thank you! But but thats really strange way to name RD, since vrf is vrf_id on creation (POST).
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:29:28 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020):

vrf_id the VRF's primary key; vrf is its RD. This is analogous to site referencing a site's slug and site_id its PK.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2020): `vrf_id` the VRF's primary key; `vrf` is its RD. This is analogous to `site` referencing a site's slug and `site_id` its PK.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3484
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?