starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Checkbox for extended search by port description #3421

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:28:58 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:58 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @gorbushka on GitHub (Feb 27, 2020).

[x] Feature request

Environment

  • Python version: 3.7
  • NetBox version: 2.6.12

Proposed Functionality

It would be very useful to enable "enhanced search" checkbox to search by all description fields of devices. I know It was already be closed without satisfaction in #1363 and #3468 and #3076 but i want to show 2 use cases.

Use Case

  1. To document far end device without creating it in netbox if it couldn't be in netbox according to accepted gathering data depth.
  2. Search some lost forgotten port or connection
Originally created by @gorbushka on GitHub (Feb 27, 2020). [x] Feature request ### Environment * Python version: 3.7 * NetBox version: 2.6.12 <!-- Describe in detail the new functionality you are proposing. Include any specific changes to work flows, data models, or the user interface. --> ### Proposed Functionality It would be very useful to enable **"enhanced search" checkbox** to search by all description fields of devices. I know It was already be closed without satisfaction in [#1363](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/1363) and [#3468](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/3468) and [#3076](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/3076) but i want to show 2 use cases. <!-- Convey an example use case for your proposed feature. Write from the perspective of a NetBox user who would benefit from the proposed functionality and describe how. ---> ### Use Case 1. To document far end device without creating it in netbox if it couldn't be in netbox according to accepted gathering data depth. 2. Search some lost forgotten port or connection
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 18:28:58 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:28:58 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2020):

This has been proposed and declined. Please don't open duplicate issues.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2020): This has been proposed and declined. Please don't open duplicate issues.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: duplicate
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3421
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?