starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow comments in device type import model #3382

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:28:36 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:36 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jmanteau on GitHub (Feb 23, 2020).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.6.9
  • NetBox version: 2.7.7

Proposed Functionality

Currently device type import does not propose comments to the import. (Original PR #451).
This feature request is to propose adding the support of comments to the device type import model.

Use Case

This would allow to add information regarding a model such as:

  • WS-C2960-48TC-L: Catalyst 2960 - 48 100M data-only copper ports with dual-purpose ports (10/100/1000 or SFP) uplinks - LAN Base
  • add the URL to the vendor website.
  • etc

This could be interesting when coupled with https://github.com/netbox-community/devicetype-library

Database Changes

None

External Dependencies

None

Originally created by @jmanteau on GitHub (Feb 23, 2020). ### Environment * Python version: 3.6.9 * NetBox version: 2.7.7 ### Proposed Functionality Currently device type import does not propose comments to the import. (Original PR #451). This feature request is to propose adding the support of comments to the device type import model. ### Use Case This would allow to add information regarding a model such as: * WS-C2960-48TC-L: Catalyst 2960 - 48 100M data-only copper ports with dual-purpose ports (10/100/1000 or SFP) uplinks - LAN Base * add the URL to the vendor website. * etc This could be interesting when coupled with https://github.com/netbox-community/devicetype-library ### Database Changes None ### External Dependencies None
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:28:37 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2020):

This was considered and declined during implementation of the import function. Comments are not included because they are not part of the real-world device definition.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 24, 2020): This was considered and declined during implementation of the import function. Comments are not included because they are not part of the real-world device definition.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3382
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?