starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Negative Voltage Support on Power Feeds #3363

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:28:18 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:18 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @craized on GitHub (Feb 20, 2020).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

Environment

  • Python version: 3.6.8
  • NetBox version: 2.7.7

Proposed Functionality

I would like to support negative voltage on power feeds.
This support could come from a change in data sanitization of the 'voltage' field
Alternatively, a negative_voltage boolean could be added (this one seems like too much trouble)

Use Case

In DC power plant applications, it's common to receive -48V DC power feeds. Specifically, this application is used in all AT&T central offices, although I'm quite certain other facilities have gone this route as well.

Database Changes

No change required for the first proposed option
For the second proposed option, a boolean field would need to be added to the dcim_powerfeed table

External Dependencies

None

Extra Notes

I posted this request on the Google Group, but haven't gotten any feedback at this point
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/netbox-discuss/pJA6cRqAbqg

Originally created by @craized on GitHub (Feb 20, 2020). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### Environment * Python version: 3.6.8 * NetBox version: 2.7.7 ### Proposed Functionality I would like to support negative voltage on power feeds. This support could come from a change in data sanitization of the 'voltage' field Alternatively, a negative_voltage boolean could be added (this one seems like too much trouble) ### Use Case In DC power plant applications, it's common to receive -48V DC power feeds. Specifically, this application is used in all AT&T central offices, although I'm quite certain other facilities have gone this route as well. ### Database Changes No change required for the first proposed option For the second proposed option, a boolean field would need to be added to the dcim_powerfeed table ### External Dependencies None ### Extra Notes I posted this request on the Google Group, but haven't gotten any feedback at this point https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/netbox-discuss/pJA6cRqAbqg
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 18:28:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:28:18 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@craized commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2020):

This references previous issue #4205 which didn't match a valid request template

@craized commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2020): This references previous issue #4205 which didn't match a valid request template
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:28:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020):

I'm honestly a little surprised this hasn't come up until now.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2020): I'm honestly a little surprised this hasn't come up until now.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3363
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?