starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

SVG rack elevations: devices should have borders separating them #3191

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:26:29 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:29 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @hellerve on GitHub (Jan 20, 2020).

Environment

  • Python version:
  • NetBox version:

Quoting from #3958:

For devices which are butted together and have the same role/colour, there is no longer any line separating them - see example below. This comprises two 2U boxes and a 4U box, but is now very hard to see.

Originally created by @hellerve on GitHub (Jan 20, 2020). <!-- NOTE: This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report. --> ### Environment * Python version: <!-- Example: 3.5.4 --> * NetBox version: <!-- Example: 2.5.2 --> Quoting from #3958: > For devices which are butted together and have the same role/colour, there is no longer any line separating them - see example below. This comprises two 2U boxes and a 4U box, but is now very hard to see. ![](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44789/72678862-bc35a780-3aa1-11ea-8c35-8db1f0d7209d.png)
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 18:26:29 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:26:29 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@candlerb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020):

This is much better, thank you. There's just one minor point remaining.

When full-depth devices are mounted at the front of the rack, and I view from the front, then I see the borders as expected. But I don't see the borders when viewing from the rear:

image

I'm not 100% sure that they had borders in the old HTML version, but I thought they did. It would be a "nice to have".

@candlerb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020): This is much better, thank you. There's just one minor point remaining. When full-depth devices are mounted at the front of the rack, and I view from the front, then I see the borders as expected. But I don't see the borders when viewing from the rear: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44789/72841431-404c8280-3c8e-11ea-85ff-d36a94a66454.png) I'm not 100% sure that they had borders in the old HTML version, but I thought they did. It would be a "nice to have".
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020):

I didn’t touch the rear part. It shouldn’t be a problem to add (basically the same change that I did for the front); if we get buy-in from @jeremystretch I’ll add it tomorrow.

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2020): I didn’t touch the rear part. It shouldn’t be a problem to add (basically the same change that I did for the front); if we get buy-in from @jeremystretch I’ll add it tomorrow.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020):

Maybe we should open a new issue for this?

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020): Maybe we should open a new issue for this?
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020):

You can open a new issue, I can approve it for you right away if you want to start on the PR

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020): You can open a new issue, I can approve it for you right away if you want to start on the PR
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020):

Thanke @DanSheps, I just opened #4019. I’ll first be able to fix it tomorrow, though, since it’s getting pretty late over here in Europe! :)

@hellerve commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2020): Thanke @DanSheps, I just opened #4019. I’ll first be able to fix it tomorrow, though, since it’s getting pretty late over here in Europe! :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#3191
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?