starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

UserActions not being recorded when connecting interfaces #306

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:20:44 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:44 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @LordBoBCUP on GitHub (Jul 29, 2016).

Not sure if its intended or not, but I notice that on v.1.3.2 recent activity isn't updated when adding connections between interfaces or adding interfaces to devices, however it seems to be updated for things like VLANs and modifying circuits. Not sure if it was intended for connections & interfaces to be omitted or this is an unexpected behavior?

Originally created by @LordBoBCUP on GitHub (Jul 29, 2016). Not sure if its intended or not, but I notice that on v.1.3.2 recent activity isn't updated when adding connections between interfaces or adding interfaces to devices, however it seems to be updated for things like VLANs and modifying circuits. Not sure if it was intended for connections & interfaces to be omitted or this is an unexpected behavior?
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 16:20:44 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:20:44 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2016):

UserActions are currently only being created by the generic utility views which are extended by most views in NetBox. However, a handful of views don't use these; notably the DCIM views for manipulating individual device components. Those views should be rewritten, not only to properly record UserActions but to clean up the code base.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2016): UserActions are currently only being created by the generic utility views which are extended by most views in NetBox. However, a handful of views don't use these; notably the DCIM views for manipulating individual device components. Those views should be rewritten, not only to properly record UserActions but to clean up the code base.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#306
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?