starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Feed Legs not created/displayed in PDU Devices #2875

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:22:59 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:22:59 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @clatini on GitHub (Sep 15, 2019).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.7.3
  • NetBox version: 2.6.3

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Define a Power Feed 'Feed1' (for example: 380V, 16A, Three-Phase);
  2. Define a new Device Type 'Test PDU' adding a Power Port 'Input1' with maximum draw of 11600W and a number of outlets associated to the three legs (for example: 12 for Leg A, 12 for Leg B, 12 for Leg C);
  3. Create a new device 'PDU1' with 'Device Role 'PDU' using the Device Type template previously created;
  4. Attach the Power Port 'Input1' to the feed 'Feed1';

The 'Power Utilization' box doesn't show the Feed Legs.

1

Expected Behavior

Same as Netbox 2.6.2, after attaching the feed to the PDU Power Port, the Feed Legs are displayed in the 'Power Utilization' box.

2

Originally created by @clatini on GitHub (Sep 15, 2019). <!-- NOTE: This form is only for reproducible bugs. If you need assistance with NetBox installation, or if you have a general question, DO NOT open an issue. Instead, post to our mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/netbox-discuss Please describe the environment in which you are running NetBox. Be sure that you are running an unmodified instance of the latest stable release before submitting a bug report. --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.7.3 * NetBox version: 2.6.3 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox (or the current beta release where applicable). Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a wrapper like pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Define a Power Feed 'Feed1' (for example: 380V, 16A, Three-Phase); 2. Define a new Device Type 'Test PDU' adding a Power Port 'Input1' with maximum draw of 11600W and a number of outlets associated to the three legs (for example: 12 for Leg A, 12 for Leg B, 12 for Leg C); 3. Create a new device 'PDU1' with 'Device Role 'PDU' using the Device Type template previously created; 4. Attach the Power Port 'Input1' to the feed 'Feed1'; The 'Power Utilization' box doesn't show the Feed Legs. ![1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2264300/64914407-ede3de00-d750-11e9-8045-c2f172de450d.JPG) <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior Same as Netbox 2.6.2, after attaching the feed to the PDU Power Port, the Feed Legs are displayed in the 'Power Utilization' box. ![2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2264300/64914409-048a3500-d751-11e9-9fb7-54cf931c5516.JPG)
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:22:59 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:23:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2019):

This is happening because you've manually defined a maximum aggregate draw for the power port. If you remove that, NetBox will dynamically calculate the draw per leg based on connected outlets.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 18, 2019): This is happening because you've manually defined a maximum aggregate draw for the power port. If you remove that, NetBox will dynamically calculate the draw per leg based on connected outlets.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#2875
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?