Racks: Allow to flip and adjust unit-numbering #2731

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:21:32 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @neufeind on GitHub (Jul 10, 2019).

There is a boolean to indicate descending unit-numbering (implemented with #191). But once you change that flag for an existing rack all devices change their positions as well and the rack gets flipped upside-down (technically correct). Would it make sense to allow flipping rack-numbering once you toggle that boolean? And maybe to be able to mass-adjust numbering by +/- a few units, just in you figure out you missed to count as well one unit on the top or bottom as well?

Originally created by @neufeind on GitHub (Jul 10, 2019). There is a boolean to indicate descending unit-numbering (implemented with #191). But once you change that flag for an existing rack all devices change their positions as well and the rack gets flipped upside-down (technically correct). Would it make sense to allow flipping rack-numbering once you toggle that boolean? And maybe to be able to mass-adjust numbering by +/- a few units, just in you figure out you missed to count as well one unit on the top or bottom as well?
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:21:32 +01:00
Author
Owner

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2019):

This issue has been closed as it does not conform to one of the provided templates as required by the contributing guide. If you'd like to request that your issue be re-opened, please first update the content so that it matches the appropriate template (this may require rewriting your issue entirely).

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2019): This issue has been closed as it does not conform to one of the [provided templates](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/new/choose) as required by the [contributing guide](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md). If you'd like to request that your issue be re-opened, please first update the content so that it matches the appropriate template (this may require rewriting your issue entirely).
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#2731