starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Invalid CSV fields in Power Feed Import #2686

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:21:07 +01:00 by adam · 0 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:21:07 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @telcohusky on GitHub (Jun 21, 2019).

Environment

  • Python version: 2.7.12
  • NetBox version: 2.6.0

Steps to Reproduce

I'm running into a new issue on the Power Feeds CSV Import page. I am attempting to import my power feeds in bulk and created a CSV with my input for each possible field listed on the import page. The fields I'm specifying are in CSV below.

  1. Write a CSV using all possible Power Feed fields. Be sure to specify the 'rack_group' field for each power feed.
  2. Submit the CSV data and observe the django.core.exceptions.FieldError response. It does not appear rack_group is a valid field.

Expected Behavior

Here is my CSV with input for each field (minus the comments field).

name,panel_name,rack_group,rack_name,site,status,type,supply,phase,voltage,amperage,max_utilization,comments
PWR-CIR-1,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.03,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,208,20,80,
PWR-CIR-2,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.02,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,120,20,80,
PWR-CIR-3,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.03,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,208,20,80,

Observed Behavior

Received Error message:
image

There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator.
The complete exception is provided below:
<class 'django.core.exceptions.FieldError'>

Cannot resolve keyword 'rack_group' into field. Choices are: asset_tag, comments, created, custom_field_values, desc_units, devices, facility_id, group, group_id, id, images, last_updated, name, outer_depth, outer_unit, outer_width, powerfeed, reservations, role, role_id, serial, site, site_id, status, tagged_items, tags, tenant, tenant_id, type, u_height, width

Originally created by @telcohusky on GitHub (Jun 21, 2019). ### Environment * Python version: 2.7.12 * NetBox version: 2.6.0 <!-- Describe in detail the exact steps that someone else can take to reproduce this bug using the current stable release of NetBox (or the current beta release where applicable). Begin with the creation of any necessary database objects and call out every operation being performed explicitly. If reporting a bug in the REST API, be sure to reconstruct the raw HTTP request(s) being made: Don't rely on a wrapper like pynetbox. --> ### Steps to Reproduce I'm running into a new issue on the Power Feeds CSV Import page. I am attempting to import my power feeds in bulk and created a CSV with my input for each possible field listed on the import page. The fields I'm specifying are in CSV below. 1. Write a CSV using all possible Power Feed fields. Be sure to specify the 'rack_group' field for each power feed. 3. Submit the CSV data and observe the django.core.exceptions.FieldError response. It does not appear rack_group is a valid field. <!-- What did you expect to happen? --> ### Expected Behavior Here is my CSV with input for each field (minus the comments field). ``` name,panel_name,rack_group,rack_name,site,status,type,supply,phase,voltage,amperage,max_utilization,comments PWR-CIR-1,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.03,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,208,20,80, PWR-CIR-2,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.02,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,120,20,80, PWR-CIR-3,Lab Panel,NSG Lab,RR.LAB.03,Lab,Active,Primary,AC,Three-phase,208,20,80, ``` <!-- What happened instead? --> ### Observed Behavior Received Error message: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/52085870/59948642-56fbd400-9436-11e9-87ea-695bd3681d42.png) > There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator. > The complete exception is provided below: > <class 'django.core.exceptions.FieldError'> > > Cannot resolve keyword 'rack_group' into field. Choices are: asset_tag, comments, created, custom_field_values, desc_units, devices, facility_id, group, group_id, id, images, last_updated, name, outer_depth, outer_unit, outer_width, powerfeed, reservations, role, role_id, serial, site, site_id, status, tagged_items, tags, tenant, tenant_id, type, u_height, width
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 18:21:07 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:21:07 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#2686
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?