starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Pass-through ports missing from "add components" on device list #2534

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 18:19:44 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:19:44 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Apr 19, 2019).

Environment

  • Python version: 3.5.6
  • NetBox version: 2.5.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Navigate to the devices list
  2. At the bottom of the page, click the "Add components" button

Expected Behavior

Front ports and rear ports should be included in the list of available components

Observed Behavior

They are absent

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Apr 19, 2019). ### Environment * Python version: 3.5.6 * NetBox version: 2.5.10 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Navigate to the devices list 2. At the bottom of the page, click the "Add components" button ### Expected Behavior Front ports and rear ports should be included in the list of available components ### Observed Behavior They are absent
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 18:19:44 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:19:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2019):

IIRC these were skipped originally due to the difficulty in mapping front ports to rear ports across multiple devices simultaneously.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 19, 2019): IIRC these were skipped originally due to the difficulty in mapping front ports to rear ports across multiple devices simultaneously.
adam commented 2025-12-29 18:19:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2019):

I'm going to reject this one as there's no sane way to add front ports in bulk to multiple devices simultaneously. (Each front port must be mapped to a rear port belonging to its respective device.) As pass-through ports are static physical entities that can be defined on the DeviceType model, this shouldn't present much of an inconvenience.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 6, 2019): I'm going to reject this one as there's no sane way to add front ports in bulk to multiple devices simultaneously. (Each front port must be mapped to a rear port belonging to its respective device.) As pass-through ports are static physical entities that can be defined on the DeviceType model, this shouldn't present much of an inconvenience.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#2534
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?