starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Toggle the display of consumed rack units when creating a device #253

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:20:10 +01:00 by adam · 7 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:10 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jbro209070 on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016).

Is there anyway to only show the available positions in the rack position drop down list instead of showing the full list whether it is occupied or not? I think that would be really useful.

Originally created by @jbro209070 on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016). Is there anyway to only show the available positions in the rack position drop down list instead of showing the full list whether it is occupied or not? I think that would be really useful.
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 16:20:10 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:20:10 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016):

Personally, I like having the occupied units included in the list, as it provides something of a sanity check. But we'll see what others say. (Let's try using the +1 and -1 reactions to vote.)

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016): Personally, I like having the occupied units included in the list, as it provides something of a sanity check. But we'll see what others say. (Let's try using the +1 and -1 reactions to vote.)
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016):

I think this would probably be best addressed with a user definable configuration.

I'm going to presume we'll have many things that work for some and not for others and if they are somewhat trivial to implement (see #285) and don't creep the scope badly it would be beneficial for the user base to have them.

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016): I think this would probably be best addressed with a user definable configuration. I'm going to presume we'll have many things that work for some and not for others and if they are somewhat trivial to implement (see #285) and don't creep the scope badly it would be beneficial for the user base to have them.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Gelob commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2016):

Having mentioned this on IRC I understand the reasoning of the way it is but at the same time would like to have the option.

@Gelob commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2016): Having mentioned this on IRC I understand the reasoning of the way it is but at the same time would like to have the option.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mjclancyau commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016):

Maybe just a format change (e.g. bold) on currently occupied RUs? Or some sort of flag character or icon?

@mjclancyau commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016): Maybe just a format change (e.g. bold) on currently occupied RUs? Or some sort of flag character or icon?
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016):

@mjclancy83 Unfortunately, there's not much we can do as far as styling the stock pull-down widget. We'd have to replace it with a custom widget, which probably isn't worth the effort.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016): @mjclancy83 Unfortunately, there's not much we can do as far as styling the stock pull-down widget. We'd have to replace it with a custom widget, which probably isn't worth the effort.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016):

I will note on Mac's dropdown styles (background colors) are not visible so text styling is really the only option if we're to change the look.

I would honestly make a setting to hide consumed U's when adding a device to a rack and let the administrator decide but ultimately it may need to be a user level setting (what works for the admin doesn't always work for the end-user)

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2016): I will note on Mac's dropdown styles (background colors) are not visible so text styling is really the only option if we're to change the look. I would honestly make a setting to hide consumed U's when adding a device to a rack and let the administrator decide but ultimately it may need to be a user level setting (what works for the admin doesn't always work for the end-user)
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:20:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2017):

Closing this out as I don't see any progress being made on it. However, we're sure to implement something along this vein in a (distant) future release once the web UI becomes API-driven.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2017): Closing this out as I don't see any progress being made on it. However, we're sure to implement something along this vein in a (distant) future release once the web UI becomes API-driven.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#253
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?