Enhance Unified Summaries #213

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:19:27 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @ryanmerolle on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016).

I think unified summary pages like that site page are great!

I would suggest that any of these stats would link to a filtered view of these stats in the corresponding page.

I suggest we could introduce this across other unified pages such as:

1.) Manufacturer:

  • total number of platforms
  • total devices breakdown by device type
  • total devices breakdown by platform (recommended: a manufacturer foreign key to be added to platform)
  • total devices breakdown by device roles (I think data validation here may be over kill)

*Note: I recommend the new foreign key to allow for data validation fields when selecting a platform for a device.

2.) Rack Groups:

  • total devices
  • total free RUs
  • total used RUs
  • total circuits (optional, may be over kill)

3.) Device Types:

  • total devices

4.) Prefixes:

  • % of IP space used or available?
  • VLAN (if associated)

4.) VRFs:

  • Number of prefixes

5.) RIRs:

  • Number Prefixes
  • % of IPs used/available?

5.) Providers:

  • Number of circuits

Thoughts? Other suggestions?

Originally created by @ryanmerolle on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016). I think unified summary pages like that site page are great! I would suggest that any of these stats would link to a filtered view of these stats in the corresponding page. I suggest we could introduce this across other unified pages such as: **1.) Manufacturer:** - total number of platforms - total devices breakdown by device type - total devices breakdown by platform (recommended: a manufacturer foreign key to be added to platform) - total devices breakdown by device roles (I think data validation here may be over kill) _*Note: I recommend the new foreign key to allow for data validation fields when selecting a platform for a device._ **2.) Rack Groups:** - total devices - total free RUs - total used RUs - total circuits (optional, may be over kill) **3.) Device Types:** - total devices **4.) Prefixes:** - % of IP space used or available? - VLAN (if associated) **4.) VRFs:** - Number of prefixes **5.) RIRs:** - Number Prefixes - % of IPs used/available? **5.) Providers:** - Number of circuits Thoughts? Other suggestions?
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 16:19:27 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:19:28 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2017):

This feature request has languished for quite a while. Some of these have probably been addressed since it was open; others may or may not be addressed. I'm going to close this out but encourage people to open new requests for any specific details they'd like to see added (please limit the scope of a request to a single model).

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 13, 2017): This feature request has languished for quite a while. Some of these have probably been addressed since it was open; others may or may not be addressed. I'm going to close this out but encourage people to open new requests for any specific details they'd like to see added (please limit the scope of a request to a single model).
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#213