starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Rack roles #181

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:19:01 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:01 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @bellwood on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016).

Would it be possible to allow rack name aliases?

We often refer to racks internally by their purpose (hosting, VPS, cloud, backup, demarc, etc) or by the colo customers name/company who is occupying the rack.

Originally created by @bellwood on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016). Would it be possible to allow rack name aliases? We often refer to racks internally by their purpose (hosting, VPS, cloud, backup, demarc, etc) or by the colo customers name/company who is occupying the rack.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:19:01 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016):

You could also base the primary key and slug on netbox assigned IDs. That way naming can overlap if needed. It allows flexibility. I'm not a huge fan, but it's an option.

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016): You could also base the primary key and slug on netbox assigned IDs. That way naming can overlap if needed. It allows flexibility. I'm not a huge fan, but it's an option.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016):

Would be nice, I have multiple colo customers with multiple racks

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016): Would be nice, I have multiple colo customers with multiple racks
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016):

Would this be addressed by a combination of #132 (tagging) and #16 (multitenancy)?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016): Would this be addressed by a combination of #132 (tagging) and #16 (multitenancy)?
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:03 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016):

Potentially universal search would - not sure on multi-tenancy

Would depend on implementation I suppose

@bellwood commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2016): Potentially universal search would - not sure on multi-tenancy Would depend on implementation I suppose
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:19:04 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016):

After some discussion, we'd like to implement roles for racks, similar to the roles we have for devices, prefixes, and VLANs. These will be user-defineable and optional.

Roles could be combined with multitenancy to cover the customer/colocation aspect.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016): After some discussion, we'd like to implement roles for racks, similar to the roles we have for devices, prefixes, and VLANs. These will be user-defineable and optional. Roles could be combined with multitenancy to cover the customer/colocation aspect.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#181
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?