starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Request for more interface types: STM1/OC3 #1725

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:34:44 +01:00 by adam · 0 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:34:44 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @oysteingy on GitHub (May 11, 2018).

Issue type

[X] Feature request
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • Python version: ALL
  • NetBox version: ALL

Description

Hi,

First, thanks for the impressive work done to Netbox.

I have a request for more type of interfaces, namely STM1/OC3

STM1 and OC3 has been mentioned several times in #167, yet I can't see any reason why this particular interface type has not been added - I assume that no-one have really requested this particular interface type, only mentioned it.

As OC3 and STM1 uses the same type of hardware, i believe it's reasonable to group them together as done with IFACE_FF_100ME_FIXED, '100BASE-TX (10/100ME).'

The necessary work should be trivial, adding two lines to dcim/constants.py

IFACE_FF_STM1 = 4060
 [IFACE_FF_STM1, 'STM1/OC3 (155 Mbps)'],

I'm glad to make a PR for it if this looks reasonable.

Originally created by @oysteingy on GitHub (May 11, 2018). ### Issue type [X] Feature request <!-- An enhancement of existing functionality --> [ ] Bug report <!-- Unexpected or erroneous behavior --> [ ] Documentation <!-- A modification to the documentation --> ### Environment * Python version: ALL * NetBox version: ALL ### Description Hi, First, thanks for the impressive work done to Netbox. I have a request for more type of interfaces, namely STM1/OC3 STM1 and OC3 has been mentioned several times in #167, yet I can't see any reason why this particular interface type has not been added - I assume that no-one have really requested this particular interface type, only mentioned it. As OC3 and STM1 uses the same type of hardware, i believe it's reasonable to group them together as done with IFACE_FF_100ME_FIXED, '100BASE-TX (10/100ME).' The necessary work should be trivial, adding two lines to dcim/constants.py ```python IFACE_FF_STM1 = 4060 [IFACE_FF_STM1, 'STM1/OC3 (155 Mbps)'], ``` I'm glad to make a PR for it if this looks reasonable.
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 16:34:44 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:34:44 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1725
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?