starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Tenant filtering issue #1628

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @cslingerland on GitHub (Mar 16, 2018).

Issue type

[ ] Feature request
[ x] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • Python version: 3
  • NetBox version: 2.3

Description

When filtering the tenants by a custom Boolean field (true/false) it returns a list of tenants that is not accurate, and duplicate entries appear. Other custom fields that we have filter correctly, just the ones that are Boolean produce this behavior.

  1. create multiple boolean custom fields on tenants with no default set
  2. assign some tenants to true and false for each boolean field
  3. filter tenants based on those boolean fields. try a few different types of filters

The above steps allowed me to re-create the issue.

Originally created by @cslingerland on GitHub (Mar 16, 2018). ### Issue type [ ] Feature request <!-- An enhancement of existing functionality --> [ x] Bug report <!-- Unexpected or erroneous behavior --> [ ] Documentation <!-- A modification to the documentation --> ### Environment * Python version: 3 * NetBox version: 2.3 ### Description When filtering the tenants by a custom Boolean field (true/false) it returns a list of tenants that is not accurate, and duplicate entries appear. Other custom fields that we have filter correctly, just the ones that are Boolean produce this behavior. 1. create multiple boolean custom fields on tenants with no default set 2. assign some tenants to true and false for each boolean field 3. filter tenants based on those boolean fields. try a few different types of filters The above steps allowed me to re-create the issue.
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

Please provide the list of steps necessary to reproduce this bug, beginning with the creation of example tenants.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): Please provide the list of steps necessary to reproduce this bug, beginning with the creation of example tenants.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cslingerland commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

After some additional testing, this happens only when you have multiple boolean fields attached to an object. If you setup 2 or 3 boolean custom fields on Tenants, and you start filtering, it returns lists that have duplicate tenant entries, and incorrect entries. Please try reproducing on your side by creating multiple boolean fields on tenants and then setting a few of those per client. Then filter.

@cslingerland commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): After some additional testing, this happens only when you have multiple boolean fields attached to an object. If you setup 2 or 3 boolean custom fields on Tenants, and you start filtering, it returns lists that have duplicate tenant entries, and incorrect entries. Please try reproducing on your side by creating multiple boolean fields on tenants and then setting a few of those per client. Then filter.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1628
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?