starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow Clusters to span multiple sites #1627

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:36 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @kasimon on GitHub (Mar 20, 2018).

Issue type

[X] Feature request

Environment

  • Python version: 2.7.13
  • NetBox version: 2.3.1

Description

We are running virtualization clusters that span several sites, which we currently can not elegantly represent in netbox. So if there is sufficient demand, we would be happy if the ability to assign multiple sites to a cluster could be added to netbox. Another possibility would be to completely rely on the site information provided by the cluster host devices and just display those.

Originally created by @kasimon on GitHub (Mar 20, 2018). ### Issue type [X] Feature request ### Environment * Python version: 2.7.13 * NetBox version: 2.3.1 ### Description We are running virtualization clusters that span several sites, which we currently can not elegantly represent in netbox. So if there is sufficient demand, we would be happy if the ability to assign multiple sites to a cluster could be added to netbox. Another possibility would be to completely rely on the site information provided by the cluster host devices and just display those.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:33:37 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@unixhaj commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

We are not using netbox yet (but are looking into it), we are also planning on Stretch Clusters (using VMware) in the near future, so this change would be very welcome.

@unixhaj commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): We are not using netbox yet (but are looking into it), we are also planning on Stretch Clusters (using VMware) in the near future, so this change would be very welcome.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018):

This would conflict with #1943, which would allow for non-unique cluster names in different sites.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2018): This would conflict with #1943, which would allow for non-unique cluster names in different sites.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:33:38 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2018):

Closing this out as it would greatly complicate the data model. Please note that the assignment of a cluster to a site is completely optional.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2018): Closing this out as it would greatly complicate the data model. Please note that the assignment of a cluster to a site is completely optional.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1627
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?