Having Clone feature #1623

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:33:33 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @mabazyar on GitHub (Mar 10, 2018).

Issue type

[X] Feature request
[] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • Python version: 3.5.2
  • NetBox version: v2.3.1

Description

It would be nice if we had clone feature in place to carry over what we have already done on a record. If it was in place, all we would need to do is that tweaking the entries in cloned record and get that submitted with different name.

In fact, that exactly what we do in Zabbix.

Originally created by @mabazyar on GitHub (Mar 10, 2018). ### Issue type [X] Feature request [] Bug report [ ] Documentation ### Environment * Python version: 3.5.2 * NetBox version: v2.3.1 ### Description It would be nice if we had clone feature in place to carry over what we have already done on a record. If it was in place, all we would need to do is that tweaking the entries in cloned record and get that submitted with different name. In fact, that exactly what we do in Zabbix.
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 16:33:33 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:33:33 +01:00
Author
Owner

@cimnine commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2018):

I think you can use the import/export functionality to mimic this.

@cimnine commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2018): I think you can use the import/export functionality to mimic this.
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2018):

Sounds like a duplicate of #33

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2018): Sounds like a duplicate of #33
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1623