starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 22:03:32 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #18929] [MERGED] Fixes #18928: Fix support for cascading deletions when cleaning up expired changelog records #15476

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-30 00:22:10 +01:00 by adam · 0 comments
adam commented 2025-12-30 00:22:10 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/18929
Author: @jeremystretch
Created: 3/17/2025
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 3/19/2025
Merged by: @bctiemann

Base: main ← Head: 18928-housekeeping-changelog-cleanup

📝 Commits (1)

  • c5801f9 Fixes #18928: Fix support for cascading deletions when cleaning up expired changelog records

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+1 additions, -2 deletions)

View changed files

📝 netbox/extras/management/commands/housekeeping.py (+1 -2)

📄 Description

Fixes: #18928

  • Use the conventional delete() method rather than _raw_delete()

Note: This will have some performance impact, but it should be negligible in most circumstances. It's not expected to be concerning as the housekeeping task is typically run in the background anyway.

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/18929 **Author:** [@jeremystretch](https://github.com/jeremystretch) **Created:** 3/17/2025 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 3/19/2025 **Merged by:** [@bctiemann](https://github.com/bctiemann) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `18928-housekeeping-changelog-cleanup` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`c5801f9`](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/commit/c5801f988127cdb764d765b1452e1b4d46f7c834) Fixes #18928: Fix support for cascading deletions when cleaning up expired changelog records ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+1 additions, -2 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `netbox/extras/management/commands/housekeeping.py` (+1 -2) </details> ### 📄 Description ### Fixes: #18928 - Use the conventional `delete()` method rather than `_raw_delete()` Note: This _will_ have some performance impact, but it should be negligible in most circumstances. It's not expected to be concerning as the housekeeping task is typically run in the background anyway. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
adam added the pull-request label 2025-12-30 00:22:10 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-30 00:22:10 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#15476
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?