[PR #17801] [CLOSED] Draft: Support for Wireguard vpn #15201

Closed
opened 2025-12-30 00:20:35 +01:00 by adam · 0 comments
Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/17801
Author: @mulmat
Created: 10/17/2024
Status: Closed

Base: developHead: 16180-added-support-for-wireguard-vpn


📝 Commits (1)

  • 351ab1e Draft code for Wireguard support

📊 Changes

14 files changed (+421 additions, -14 deletions)

View changed files

📝 netbox/dcim/models/device_components.py (+10 -0)
📝 netbox/netbox/navigation/menu.py (+1 -0)
📝 netbox/templates/vpn/tunnel.html (+6 -4)
netbox/templates/vpn/wireguardconfig.html (+32 -0)
📝 netbox/virtualization/models/virtualmachines.py (+6 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/api/serializers_/crypto.py (+11 -1)
📝 netbox/vpn/choices.py (+2 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/forms/model_forms.py (+106 -8)
netbox/vpn/migrations/0006_wireguardconfig_and_more.py (+49 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/models/crypto.py (+102 -1)
📝 netbox/vpn/models/tunnels.py (+4 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/tables/crypto.py (+34 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/urls.py (+8 -0)
📝 netbox/vpn/views.py (+50 -0)

📄 Description

Fixes: #16180

I've spent some time thinking how to model Wireguard vpns in Netbox which resulted in this draft PR.
I wish to get some feedback if this modelling looks like something that could be accepted. If you think it looks promising I'll continue and submit a complete PR.


🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/17801 **Author:** [@mulmat](https://github.com/mulmat) **Created:** 10/17/2024 **Status:** ❌ Closed **Base:** `develop` ← **Head:** `16180-added-support-for-wireguard-vpn` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`351ab1e`](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/commit/351ab1ecb07e918ed032e8ebda98735b6614cf6d) Draft code for Wireguard support ### 📊 Changes **14 files changed** (+421 additions, -14 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `netbox/dcim/models/device_components.py` (+10 -0) 📝 `netbox/netbox/navigation/menu.py` (+1 -0) 📝 `netbox/templates/vpn/tunnel.html` (+6 -4) ➕ `netbox/templates/vpn/wireguardconfig.html` (+32 -0) 📝 `netbox/virtualization/models/virtualmachines.py` (+6 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/api/serializers_/crypto.py` (+11 -1) 📝 `netbox/vpn/choices.py` (+2 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/forms/model_forms.py` (+106 -8) ➕ `netbox/vpn/migrations/0006_wireguardconfig_and_more.py` (+49 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/models/crypto.py` (+102 -1) 📝 `netbox/vpn/models/tunnels.py` (+4 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/tables/crypto.py` (+34 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/urls.py` (+8 -0) 📝 `netbox/vpn/views.py` (+50 -0) </details> ### 📄 Description <!-- Thank you for your interest in contributing to NetBox! Please note that our contribution policy requires that a feature request or bug report be approved and assigned prior to opening a pull request. This helps avoid waste time and effort on a proposed change that we might not be able to accept. IF YOUR PULL REQUEST DOES NOT REFERENCE AN ISSUE WHICH HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO YOU, IT WILL BE CLOSED AUTOMATICALLY. Please specify your assigned issue number on the line below. --> ### Fixes: #16180 <!-- Please include a summary of the proposed changes below. --> I've spent some time thinking how to model Wireguard vpns in Netbox which resulted in this draft PR. I wish to get some feedback if this modelling looks like something that could be accepted. If you think it looks promising I'll continue and submit a complete PR. --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
adam added the pull-request label 2025-12-30 00:20:35 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-30 00:20:35 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#15201