starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

IP Address Inheriance not working properly #1399

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Zimeon- on GitHub (Nov 15, 2017).

Issue type

[ ] Feature request
[X] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • Python version: Python 2.7.5
  • NetBox version: NetBox (v2.2.4)

Description

Related to issue https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/1548 that was closed. The URL does contain tenant values, but they are not populated on page. Could be due to multiple tenant groups perhaps (just a wild guess).

Url is as following;
?address=10.10.10.0/24&vrf=1&tenant=2

Originally created by @Zimeon- on GitHub (Nov 15, 2017). ### Issue type [ ] Feature request <!-- An enhancement of existing functionality --> [X] Bug report <!-- Unexpected or erroneous behavior --> [ ] Documentation <!-- A modification to the documentation --> ### Environment * Python version: Python 2.7.5 * NetBox version: NetBox (v2.2.4) ### Description Related to issue https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/1548 that was closed. The URL does contain tenant values, but they are not populated on page. Could be due to multiple tenant groups perhaps (just a wild guess). Url is as following; ?address=10.10.10.0/24&vrf=1&tenant=2
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2017):

Please describe the steps you're taking to create this bug, and what is happening versus what you expected to happen.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2017): Please describe the steps you're taking to create this bug, and what is happening versus what you expected to happen.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Zimeon- commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2017):

When clicking on "Add an IP-Address" from a prefix view, expected behaviour would be that the tenant value to be pre-filled using the prefix tenant value like vrf. At the moment the tenant is at the default, none "-------".

@Zimeon- commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2017): When clicking on "Add an IP-Address" from a prefix view, expected behaviour would be that the tenant value to be pre-filled using the prefix tenant value like vrf. At the moment the tenant is at the default, none "-------".
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2017):

This seems to happen only when the assigned tenant is assigned to a group.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2017): This seems to happen only when the assigned tenant is assigned to a group.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2017):

Fixed in 252be84bf0

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2017): Fixed in 252be84bf07a27868c9e5548558834b2fd62e3d8
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:32:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@andreasfreitag commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017):

Hi Jeremy, thanks for fixing it with "Add an IP Address". But it has the same behavior when you add a IP Address direct from the IP Addresses List -> "xx IPs aivailable" (no tenant_group ID in the URL)... Thanks for all your work.

@andreasfreitag commented on GitHub (Dec 14, 2017): Hi Jeremy, thanks for fixing it with "Add an IP Address". But it has the same behavior when you add a IP Address direct from the IP Addresses List -> "xx IPs aivailable" (no tenant_group ID in the URL)... Thanks for all your work.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1399
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?