starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Ability to disable 'secrets' #1330

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:31:31 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:31 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @candlerb on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017).

Issue type

[X] Feature request
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • Python version: 3.5.2
  • NetBox version: 2.2.2

Description

Since we are not using 'secrets', it would be nice to have a way to disable them entirely from the UI to reduce clutter and having to explain why it's there.

I note that when the user is not logged in, the secrets sections are already hidden from the main menu and on the Device page.

Looking at the code 1, 2, right now it appears to be a checking only whether the user is logged in. This could be factored out into a more general test which also checks a global flag in settings.py; or perhaps add a new "permission" type e.g. "can view secrets".

Originally created by @candlerb on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017). ### Issue type [X] Feature request <!-- Requesting the implementation of a new feature --> [ ] Bug report <!-- Reporting unexpected or erroneous behavior --> [ ] Documentation <!-- Proposing a modification to the documentation --> ### Environment * Python version: 3.5.2 * NetBox version: 2.2.2 ### Description Since we are not using 'secrets', it would be nice to have a way to disable them entirely from the UI to reduce clutter and having to explain why it's there. I note that when the user is not logged in, the secrets sections are already hidden from the main menu and on the Device page. Looking at the code [1](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/templates/inc/nav_menu.html#L351), [2](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/templates/dcim/device.html#L175), right now it appears to be a checking only whether the user is logged in. This could be factored out into a more general test which also checks a global flag in `settings.py`; or perhaps add a new "permission" type e.g. "can view secrets".
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:31:31 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:32 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017):

Folding this in with #426

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 19, 2017): Folding this in with #426
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1330
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?