starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add CPAK and CVR form factor #1274

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @beufanet on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017).

Issue type : Feature request

Environment

  • Python version: 2.7.9
  • NetBox version: 2.1.5

Description

Add new form factors for interfaces

Cisco CPAK and CVR are proprietary form factor for 100G optics.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/transceiver-modules/data_sheet_c78-728110.html

We use it for Cisco N77 and ASR module, and sometimes running CVR (CFP2 to CPAK adapter).

We propose this patch for the community ;)

PR to come

Originally created by @beufanet on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017). ### Issue type : Feature request ### Environment * Python version: 2.7.9 * NetBox version: 2.1.5 ### Description Add new form factors for interfaces Cisco CPAK and CVR are proprietary form factor for 100G optics. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/transceiver-modules/data_sheet_c78-728110.html We use it for Cisco N77 and ASR module, and sometimes running CVR (CFP2 to CPAK adapter). We propose this patch for the community ;) PR to come
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017):

PR : https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/pull/1552/files

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017): PR : https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/pull/1552/files
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:30:59 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2017):

According to the data sheet, the CVR is an adapter for the CPAK form factor, and not a form factor itself. I'll add CPAK as a 100GE form factor.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2017): According to the data sheet, the CVR is an adapter for the CPAK form factor, and not a form factor itself. I'll add CPAK as a 100GE form factor.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2017):

Also adding the CFP2 and CFP4 100GE form factors.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2017): Also adding the CFP2 and CFP4 100GE form factors.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2017):

So should I suggest another patch or you manage it ?

Thanks !

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2017): So should I suggest another patch or you manage it ? Thanks !
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2017):

The CPAK form factor has been added and will be included in v2.2.0. CVR will not be added because it is not a type of interface.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 10, 2017): The CPAK form factor has been added and will be included in v2.2.0. CVR will not be added because it is not a type of interface.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:31:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2017):

Thanks !

@beufanet commented on GitHub (Oct 11, 2017): Thanks !
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1274
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?