starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

IP address inheritance #1271

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:30:57 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:30:57 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Zimeon- on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017).

E## Issue type
[X] Feature request
[ ] Bug report
[ ] Documentation

Environment

  • NetBox version: 2.1.4

Description

IPAM IP-Address form could inherit tenant information from a prefix, especially in local subnets. I would propose an addition to prefixes that would define if information is inherited or not. Public IP-spaces would most likely not need this while when working with private address spaces it's common for the IP owner to be the same as the prefix.

This would reduce the amount of clicks required and be a good quality of life improvement. This would require a new boolean in the prefix table that is checked when "Add a new IP address" form is opened when adding an IP within the prefix. At t he moment VRF is inherited.

Originally created by @Zimeon- on GitHub (Oct 2, 2017). E## Issue type [X] Feature request [ ] Bug report [ ] Documentation ### Environment * NetBox version: 2.1.4 ### Description IPAM IP-Address form could inherit tenant information from a prefix, especially in local subnets. I would propose an addition to prefixes that would define if information is inherited or not. Public IP-spaces would most likely not need this while when working with private address spaces it's common for the IP owner to be the same as the prefix. This would reduce the amount of clicks required and be a good quality of life improvement. This would require a new boolean in the prefix table that is checked when "Add a new IP address" form is opened when adding an IP within the prefix. At t he moment VRF is inherited.
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 16:30:57 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:30:58 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:30:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Zimeon- commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2017):

Can't seem to get this to work. Upgraded to 2.2.1 with Python 2.7.5. Anyone else able to confirm?

@Zimeon- commented on GitHub (Oct 13, 2017): Can't seem to get this to work. Upgraded to 2.2.1 with Python 2.7.5. Anyone else able to confirm?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1271
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?