starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow the Object types selection list when editing permissions to be resizable #11864

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:50:55 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:55 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @thomaschristory on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025).

NetBox version

v.4.4.6

Feature type

Other

Proposed functionality

The list where we select what Object type to include in a permission is fixed in width, which make it difficult to correctly see/select some options if the name is long.
It's ok-ish for the native objects, but can get complicated for the custom objects plugin, or the document storage one, where the base name of the plugin is already quite long:

Being able to resize this in length and width would be very helpful.

Use case

We're using the customer objects and Document storage plugins.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @thomaschristory on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025). ### NetBox version v.4.4.6 ### Feature type Other ### Proposed functionality The list where we select what Object type to include in a permission is fixed in width, which make it difficult to correctly see/select some options if the name is long. It's ok-ish for the native objects, but can get complicated for the custom objects plugin, or the document storage one, where the base name of the plugin is already quite long: Being able to resize this in length and width would be very helpful. ### Use case We're using the customer objects and Document storage plugins. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurestatus: duplicatenetbox labels 2025-12-29 21:50:55 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:50:55 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

I believe this is asking for basically the same thing as #20759, correct?

I'm going to go ahead and close it as a duplicate for now. If I'm wrong, please let me know and we can re-open this FR.

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): I believe this is asking for basically the same thing as #20759, correct? I'm going to go ahead and close it as a duplicate for now. If I'm wrong, please let me know and we can re-open this FR.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@thomaschristory commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

it is, my bad I failed at doing a proper research !

@thomaschristory commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): it is, my bad I failed at doing a proper research !
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025):

it is, my bad I failed at doing a proper research !

No worries! It happens.

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Nov 21, 2025): > it is, my bad I failed at doing a proper research ! No worries! It happens.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label netbox status: duplicate type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11864
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?