Object Type filter is ignored for L2VPN Terminations #11855

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:50:45 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @Bapths on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @pheus on GitHub.

NetBox Edition

NetBox Community

NetBox Version

v4.4.6

Python Version

3.12

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a L2VPN.
  2. Add multiple terminations with different types (ex: 1 device interface + 1 vlan)
  3. Go to the L2VPN termination table view
  4. Click on filters
  5. Select an "Assigned object type" (ex: DCIM > Interface)
  6. Click Search

Expected Behavior

Only the terminations assigned to the filtered object type should be listed.

Observed Behavior

All terminations are listed.

Originally created by @Bapths on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025). Originally assigned to: @pheus on GitHub. ### NetBox Edition NetBox Community ### NetBox Version v4.4.6 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a L2VPN. 2. Add multiple terminations with different types (ex: 1 device interface + 1 vlan) 3. Go to the L2VPN termination table view 4. Click on filters 5. Select an "Assigned object type" (ex: DCIM > Interface) 6. Click Search ### Expected Behavior Only the terminations assigned to the filtered object type should be listed. ### Observed Behavior All terminations are listed.
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptednetboxseverity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:50:45 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:50:45 +01:00
Author
Owner

@pheus commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025):

I’m happy to open a PR if this bug gets accepted.

@pheus commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025): I’m happy to open a PR if this bug gets accepted.
Author
Owner

@Bapths commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025):

It looks similar to issue #20839, but this time the _id is not missing so I am not sure what's causing the issue.

@Bapths commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025): It looks similar to issue #20839, but this time the `_id` is not missing so I am not sure what's causing the issue.
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025):

@pheus tagging you for this as you have #20839 as well. Thanks!

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 20, 2025): @pheus tagging you for this as you have #20839 as well. Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11855