starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

VLAN groups count on Sites #11811

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:50:10 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:10 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @rjankielsz on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025).

NetBox version

v4.4.4

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

It would be useful to have the vlangroup_count for sites as VLANs associated directly to sites is deprecated. Currently, we have access to the following object counts on sites:
"circuit_count": 0,
"device_count": 0,
"prefix_count": 3,
"rack_count": 0,
"virtualmachine_count": 0,
"vlan_count": 0

Image

Use case

Since the recommended approach is assigning VLANs to VLAN groups, which can then be assigned to Sites. This information would be useful in obtaining relevant VLAN information for a site.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @rjankielsz on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025). ### NetBox version v4.4.4 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality It would be useful to have the vlangroup_count for sites as VLANs associated directly to sites is deprecated. Currently, we have access to the following object counts on sites: "circuit_count": 0, "device_count": 0, "prefix_count": 3, "rack_count": 0, "virtualmachine_count": 0, "vlan_count": 0 <img width="352" height="138" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8eeb2719-bd34-43ad-9dfe-7660d6c6e193" /> ### Use case Since the recommended approach is assigning VLANs to VLAN groups, which can then be assigned to Sites. This information would be useful in obtaining relevant VLAN information for a site. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurenetbox labels 2025-12-29 21:50:10 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:50:10 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:10 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 6, 2025):

Could you please restate your proposed changes to be more clear? Does this impact only sites? Why not include other objects to which VLAN groups can be assigned as well?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 6, 2025): Could you please restate your proposed changes to be more clear? Does this impact only sites? Why not include other objects to which VLAN groups can be assigned as well?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rjankielsz commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2025):

Initially, my thought was for sites since VLANs asssociated to Sites has been announced as deprecated. However, this change could include all objects to which VLAN groups could be assigned.

@rjankielsz commented on GitHub (Nov 12, 2025): Initially, my thought was for sites since VLANs asssociated to Sites has been announced as deprecated. However, this change could include all objects to which VLAN groups could be assigned.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:50:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2025):

We don't do this because it is a generic foreign key and we don't provide this on other scoped objects like Rack and Region.

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Nov 13, 2025): We don't do this because it is a generic foreign key and we don't provide this on other scoped objects like Rack and Region.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label netbox type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11811
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?