starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

An exception when attempting to view IP addresses filtered by a specific VRF. #11393

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:44:34 +01:00 by adam · 10 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:34 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @someconservator on GitHub (Jul 18, 2025).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.3.3

Python Version

3.12

Steps to Reproduce

  1. go https://netbox.fqdn/ipam/ip-addresses/
  2. Filters -> Assigned VRF -> choose specified (one!) VRF
  3. Search

Expected Behavior

List of IPs

Observed Behavior

https://netbox.fqdn/ipam/ip-addresses/?vrf_id=39

Server Error

There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator.

The complete exception is provided below:

<class 'AttributeError'>

'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_absolute_url'

Python version: 3.11.11
NetBox version: 4.3.3
Plugins: None installed

Originally created by @someconservator on GitHub (Jul 18, 2025). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.3.3 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. go https://netbox.fqdn/ipam/ip-addresses/ 2. Filters -> Assigned VRF -> choose specified (one!) VRF 3. Search ### Expected Behavior List of IPs ### Observed Behavior https://netbox.fqdn/ipam/ip-addresses/?vrf_id=39 Server Error There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator. The complete exception is provided below: <class 'AttributeError'> 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_absolute_url' Python version: 3.11.11 NetBox version: 4.3.3 Plugins: None installed
adam added the type: bugpending closurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 21:44:34 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:44:34 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2025):

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 18, 2025): Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2025):

Jeremy,
may i ask what additional data would be nice to provide here to clarify what is happening in more detail?
Thank you.

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2025): Jeremy, may i ask what additional data would be nice to provide here to clarify what is happening in more detail? Thank you.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2025):

@someconservator I've been unable to replicate this issue.

In this example,

  • I've created 2x VRFs
  • I've created 2x IP Addresses (one assigned to each VRF)
  • I've successfully filtered by a VRF
Image Image Image

Jeremy is referring to the specific steps of how this issue can be reproduced - is this something you can provide us with?

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2025): @someconservator I've been unable to replicate this issue. In this example, - I've created 2x VRFs - I've created 2x IP Addresses (one assigned to each VRF) - I've successfully filtered by a VRF <img width="1920" height="937" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9384d758-fc07-4add-9bf0-c75e7cfe44ee" /> <img width="1920" height="937" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/05f87d40-190c-465a-ab42-e6b9a2c4f66d" /> <img width="1920" height="937" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dda58ec-e96d-47b8-b1ed-dda291b2b254" /> Jeremy is referring to the **specific** steps of how this issue can be reproduced - is this something you can provide us with?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025):

May be this? 511 IP-addresses in 34 prefixes?
Image

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025): May be this? 511 IP-addresses in 34 prefixes? <img width="796" height="131" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f3e927b8-48c7-4309-9267-d17f41fa1713" />
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025):

May be this? 511 IP-addresses in 34 prefixes?
Image

Are you able to share this data?

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025): > May be this? 511 IP-addresses in 34 prefixes? > <img width="796" height="131" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f3e927b8-48c7-4309-9267-d17f41fa1713" /> Are you able to share this data?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025):

I guess I need to ask our security department about this and they will most likely ask me to specify what exactly needs to be shared. Could you help me specify which specific tables or parts of ones need to be shared? Or all IPAM?

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025): I guess I need to ask our security department about this and they will most likely ask me to specify what exactly needs to be shared. Could you help me specify which specific tables or parts of ones need to be shared? Or all IPAM?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025):

I guess I need to ask our security department about this and they will most likely ask me to specify what exactly needs to be shared. Could you help me specify which specific tables or parts of ones need to be shared? Or all IPAM?

The minimum viable data to reproduce the issue would be required here, even if you fudge some of the numbers. It would be useful to see if you can replicate the problem.

@stuntguy3000 commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2025): > I guess I need to ask our security department about this and they will most likely ask me to specify what exactly needs to be shared. Could you help me specify which specific tables or parts of ones need to be shared? Or all IPAM? The minimum viable data to reproduce the issue would be required here, even if you fudge some of the numbers. It would be useful to see if you can replicate the problem.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025):

In short, it looks like it's again a lack of time to execute a query for large samples. I increased the wait time for the gunicorn to 3 minutes and the bug went away. We probably just have a large database.

@someconservator commented on GitHub (Jul 30, 2025): In short, it looks like it's again a lack of time to execute a query for large samples. I increased the wait time for the gunicorn to 3 minutes and the bug went away. We probably just have a large database.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2025):

This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2025): This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:44:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2025):

This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 15, 2025): This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: revisions needed type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11393
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?