starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

exception when reassign oob ip for a device. #11341

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:43:53 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:43:53 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @hanyuwei70 on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.3.3

Python Version

3.12

Steps to Reproduce

  1. assign an oob ip to a device interface marked "oob only".
  2. delete this assignment (you need to change oob ip).
  3. assign a new oob ip marked "oob only".

Expected Behavior

it will assign without problem.

Observed Behavior

it will show up

<class 'django.db.utils.IntegrityError'>

duplicate key value violates unique constraint "dcim_device_oob_ip_id_key"
DETAIL:  Key (oob_ip_id)=(319) already exists.

Python 版本: 3.12.3
NetBox 版本: 4.3.3-Docker-3.3.0
插件: 
  netbox_topology_views: 4.3.0
Originally created by @hanyuwei70 on GitHub (Jul 3, 2025). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.3.3 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. assign an oob ip to a device interface marked "oob only". 2. delete this assignment (you need to change oob ip). 3. assign a new oob ip marked "oob only". ### Expected Behavior it will assign without problem. ### Observed Behavior it will show up ``` <class 'django.db.utils.IntegrityError'> duplicate key value violates unique constraint "dcim_device_oob_ip_id_key" DETAIL: Key (oob_ip_id)=(319) already exists. Python 版本: 3.12.3 NetBox 版本: 4.3.3-Docker-3.3.0 插件: netbox_topology_views: 4.3.0 ```
adam added the type: bugstatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 21:43:53 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:43:54 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:43:55 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2025):

@hanyuwei70 Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

Can you please add clear steps, which menu items and screens you are going to and what fields you are selecting.

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2025): @hanyuwei70 Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports. Can you please add clear steps, which menu items and screens you are going to and what fields you are selecting.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:43:55 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hanyuwei70 commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2025):

@arthanson Thanks for your time. But I have failed to reproduce it on the same instance. And can be worked around with deletion of related IP. I will close this issue and hope can provide some reference for others.

@hanyuwei70 commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2025): @arthanson Thanks for your time. But I have failed to reproduce it on the same instance. And can be worked around with deletion of related IP. I will close this issue and hope can provide some reference for others.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: revisions needed type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11341
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?